Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg arrives at the Manhattan District Attorney's office in New York City, on March 23, 2023. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

By Roger Kimball

March 27, 2023Updated: March 27, 2023

biggersmaller

Print

Commentary

I’m beginning to think that the best way to understand the never-ending series of legal cases against Donald Trump is to see it as a gigantic communal jigsaw puzzle.

The ending image is clever: Seen from one perspective, it shows Donald Trump behind bars.

Seen from another perspective, though, it shows a composite image of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama superimposed on the White House, which is superimposed on a collage of images of the headquarters of the FBI, the IRS, the DHS, and half-a-dozen other agencies of the Deep State.

The great, the hitherto insuperable, difficulty is finding the interlocking few pieces that make the images snap into place.

If the agents of the state and their megaphones of the press have hitherto been unsuccessful in completing the puzzle, it hasn’t been for lack of trying.

The long years of the Russia collusion hoax were an extended effort to find, or forge, the missing pieces.

So were the twin impeachments handed down against Trump.

The raid at Mar-a-Lago last summer was an effort to find that holy grail, but once again it failed.

Now, as we approach the 2024 election season, everything has sped up.

Elsewhere, I have said that the promiscuous campaign against Trump was like a modern-day bill of attainder.

Such dubious legal devices were all the rage in Tudor England, but they were also out of favor for those who championed the rule of law.

Why? Because bills of attainder “attaint” specific people not because of what they have done but who they are.

Impartiality is an essential component of the rule of law.

Singling out specific individuals not because they have done something wrong but because of their identity, because of who they are, is inimical to the rule of law.

This is how it is with Donald Trump.

Last week Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, was rumored to be on the verge of indicting Trump for—for what?

The rationale was that in coming to a financial non-disclosure arrangement with “Stormy Daniels,” née Stephanie Gregory, Trump had allegedly been party to bookkeeping fraud, a misdemeanor.

Bragg expended enormous effort to figure out a way to elevate that to a felony.

So far his efforts have been for naught.

Maybe Bragg will continue to pursue the charge, but as of this writing it seems to be dead in the water, killed by the near-universal ridicule and contempt lavished upon it by almost as many Democrats as Republicans.

Something similar can be said about the case building in Georgia against Trump, that one ostensibly about Trump’s efforts to “subvert” the 2020 election.

That, too, appears to be going nowhere, so the great game mavens have largely moved on to their next gambit: an obstruction charge to be filed against Trump in connection with his possession of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

That case was complicated because not so long after Trump’s property was raided and his possession of the documents was reported, President Joe Biden was discovered to have classified documents in his garage, his house, and his office.

Then former Vice President Mike Pence was discovered to have classified documents.

For a moment, it seemed that possession of classified documents was the new fashion accessory, something you wouldn’t think of leaving home without.

At first, that complicated the plans of the prosecutors.

If everybody named was going to come bearing secret docs, how were the authorities to uncover the magic missing piece that would put Trump out of the way or at least out of the picture?

That didn’t work either, so as of Sunday, March 26, the die-cutters are at work trying out a charge of “obstruction.”

True, Biden and Pence had classified documents in their possession, but that was completely different.

Why? Because neither of them is Trump.

For the last six years, the minions of the regime, not only the officers themselves but also their attendant scribes and Pharisees, have been searching high and low for the magic puzzle piece that, hammered into place, would finally put paid to Donald Trump.

It hasn’t worked yet.

But their unstinting, vicious, though faintly comical efforts, remind us all that Trump was right when, in his speech in Waco, Texas, on March 25, he said, “Either the deep state destroys America, or we destroy the deep state.”

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.