The New
Trump World™
Energy Order


What About Maine?

Back in Maine, the Legislature will likely consider a watered-down version of last year’s solar compromise, which aimed to increase solar capacity in the state for rooftop solar residential users, large grid-scale distributed generation sources, cooperative solar and commercial and industrial projects. The bill was vetoed by Gov. Paul LePage and his veto sustained by House Republicans. Currently, the Maine PUC is finalizing rules that would phase out favorable rates for new solar users after 10 years and gradually get rid of benefits for existing rooftop solar producers after 15 years.

Democrat Rep. Martin Grohman of Biddeford — who serves on the Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee — said he would likely get behind separate solar bills for each sector, such as utility-scale and commercial-scale solar, rather than a comprehensive omnibus solar bill.

“It’s my view that … the whole thing is not just a big green boondoggle. There’s opportunity,” Grohman told the E2Tech crowd. “In fact, I’m here to tell you that renewable energy people are cold-blooded capitalists too.”

PUC Chairman Bruce Williamson, a LePage appointee, implied that he would be more amenable to supporting large renewable energy plants than distributed energy sources like residential rooftop solar. “What puzzles me, however, is encountering the assumption in Maine that small is beautiful as well as cheap,” said Williamson. “The assumption is that the cumulative cost to society in many small, beautiful systems is less than the cost of a centralized electricity supply system.”

As for offshore wind energy technology, Williamson expressed concerns about the costs and questioned whether developing more wind would stimulate economic development and create jobs. Speaking on behalf of the Governor’s Energy Office, LePage energy advisor Jim LaBrecque said that energy policy should focus on incentivizing energy efficiency, not making public investments in renewables. Last year, the Legislature overrode an attempt by the governor to hold $38 million in energy efficiency funding hostage because of the omission of the word “and” in a 2013 law.

LaBrecque complained at length that schools waste fuel and money by having large buses that only a few students ride and that the University of Maine leaves the lights on its football field on when there are no games to illustrate his point that environmental groups are ignoring the need for more energy efficiency measures.

“You know what, there is 12,000 people including the president of the university who probably had to buy shades for his house right on campus because the light was coming in, but nobody cared,” said LaBrecque. “And I don’t think that these people who claim that they’re so concerned about the environment and allow these things to happen are really not at all as concerned as they appear to be.”

He concluded with a shot at Democratic legislative leaders, whom he said are “jeopardizing cleaning up the environment for our children” because they don’t want solar and wind to compete “on a level playing field for financial incentives if these incentives are based strictly on performance measures.”

In response to LaBrecque’s tirade, audience member Adam Lee, chairman of Lee Auto Mall, said he agreed that energy efficiency is a place to start, but pointed out that the market doesn’t always work perfectly.

“[The market] is not always rational,” said Lee. “If it was rational, people would buy fuel-efficient cars instead of trucks that get 14 miles per gallon. People make decisions not just based on the money. There was a time that leaded gas was cheaper than unleaded gas. Cars actually run better on leaded gas and cars are cheaper if we burn leaded gas, but lead is poison. So sometimes we make decisions based on factors other than just the marketplace.” -

► Source ◄


Views: 174


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Eric A. Tuttle on November 23, 2016 at 6:37pm

Trucks that get 14 Mpg is the fault of Green Energy Renewables....... My truck gets 19 on 10% Ethanol, however would get the mandated 25 Mpg on Real Gasoline....... having run it with various levels of Ethanol, it is predictable how much loss is to be expected from the Federal Mandate of 25Mpg after a given year of production. Imagine what Cars could get.........!  But that damn Renewable Greener Energy works against it requiring 29% more gasoline for the same distance of travel....... 

Comment by Eric A. Tuttle on November 23, 2016 at 6:32pm

Lee Auto Mall...... from Maine to California (Make a wreck New and call it used) A place to avoid in my unvalued opinion after seeing some of their shady deals.  

Comment by Dan McKay on November 23, 2016 at 4:07pm

Adam Lee, what a carpetbagger !


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service