The Hysterical Narratives of the Left Such As Global Warming Have Destroyed Themselves

After a Decade of Unhinged Anti-Trump Furor, the Public Is Tuning Out the Shrill, Hysterical Left

Like the deleterious effects of inflation that eventually render a currency worthless, the nonstop hectoring, pontification, and distortion makes all such criticisms ineffective.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
President Trump looks on during the National Prayer Service at Washington National Cathedral on January 21, 2025 at Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON
VICTOR DAVIS HANSONPublished: Jan. 25, 2025 04:03 AM ETUpdated: Jan. 25, 2025 05:04 AM ET
President Trump won the 2024 election in part because the left’s hysterical style of attacking him no longer worked.
After a decade of this unhinged furor, it proved worthless in winning public support — and for two simple reasons.
One, after years of Russian collusion hoaxes, the laptop disinformation farce, and the warped lies about the “suckers” and “fine people on both sides” — the shrill left became predictable.
Advertisement
So, the bored public began tuning them out, switching channels, hitting the mute button, and pulling the plug.
Like the deleterious effects of inflation that eventually render a currency worthless, nonstop hectoring, hysterics, pontification, and distortion finally made all such criticisms of Mr. Trump mostly as valueless as 1930s German marks.
Second, the wearied public never heard reasoned counterarguments from the likes of a Rachel Maddow. Instead, on spec, she kept mouthing, “The walls are closing in” on Mr. Trump.
Advertisement
President Biden did not explain why his open border was a better idea than Mr. Trump’s closed one. He preferred mumbling about “semi-fascists!” and the “ultra-MAGA!”
The Never Trumpers did not critique the Trump deficits. Instead, they hammered away that Mr. Trump was Hitler, or Mussolini, or Putin — or just a dangerous dictator or autocrat.
Angry retired generals never demonstrated why Mr. Trump was, in their view, an existential threat to democracy. Instead, they shouted nonstop in op-eds and interviews that he was a fascist, Nazi-like, no different from the guards at Auschwitz, a pathological liar, and should be summarily removed.
Advertisement
Worn-out voters began to understand that these psychodramas were substitutes for substantive criticism or occasions for legitimate debate.
Indeed, the exhausted public finally concluded that the hysterics increased in direct proportion to the poverty of the charges.
So, what did 10 years of such derangement achieve for the left?
Mr. Trump now has control of the White House and both houses of Congress operate under Republican majorities.
The Supreme Court is mostly conservative. Almost all of Mr. Trump’s issues — the border, immigration, the economy, foreign policy, and crime — poll well over 50 percent.
No matter, the left is still hammering away at the trivial and irrelevant — and remains paralyzed in furor and hysterics.
When Snoop Dogg performed for the Trump inauguration, Ann Navarro of “The View,” in racist fashion, called the African-American rapper “a trained seal.”
When Pete Hegseth went before the Senate for confirmation as Secretary of Defense nominee, Democrats asked almost nothing about nuclear strategy, recruitment shortfalls, or a paucity of artillery shells.
Instead, what followed were animated gotcha lectures about Mr. Hegseth’s prior adultery.
No sooner had Mr. Hegseth finished his successful audit than the left rounded up his former sister-in-law, now divorced from his brother.
A hardcore Democrat, she confessed she wanted his nomination rejected. She further claimed — with no evidence — that she had “heard” from his ex-wife that Mr. Hegseth was a wife-beater.
His former wife immediately denied the charges. She pointed to their prior divorce settlement that recorded neither had ever lodged such a complaint against the other.
Next, the left went after Elon Musk. Recently, he had finished an address by touching his heart and then extending his arm out to the crowd.
To the left, that greeting now became proof of a “Nazi salute.”
Yet in no time, the internet cited photos of Secretary Clinton, President Obama, and Senator Warren all extending their stiff arms out in identical fashion to Mr. Musk.
We were next told by critics that Mr. Trump was not technically president because he did not place his left hand on the Bible as he swore his presidential oath.
The Constitution, of course, demands no such act. But it does explicitly state that no religious test shall be required to hold public office.
During a National Prayer Service for President Trump, the Episcopal bishop of Washington D.C., Mariann Budde, hijacked the sermon. 
She rebuked Mr. Trump — sitting right in front of her — because he supposedly had portrayed illegal aliens and transgender children “in the harshest of lights.”
Bishop Budde later bragged that she had used the occasion to sandbag Mr. Trump with a “one-on-one conversation.”
She talked grandly of mercy, but not of the thousands of Americans who have been physically assaulted or attacked by illegal aliens, or tens of thousands of deaths due to illegally imported fentanyl, or the unfairness of open borders to legal immigrant applicants, or the suffering of our citizen poor when their social services are overwhelmed by some 12 million illegal entries of the last four years.
In sum, the left wants no debate because they know voters have rejected what they saw and suffered during the last four years of the Biden administration.
Forgetting nothing, learning nothing, like zombies, leftists keep screaming banalities. Like addicts and their feel-good fixes, though, their hysterics only further turn off the public as they destroy themselves.
Victor Davis Hanson

Views: 19

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service