The Great Farce , Corrected! EPA Rescinds Obama-Era Finding That Served as Basis For Climate Regulation

EVs are done! 

EPA Rescinds Obama-Era Finding That Served as Basis For Climate Regulation

The Trump administration eliminated a 2009 finding that six greenhouse gases are a danger to public health

WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin on Feb. 12 announced the elimination of a 2009 finding that served as the basis of U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

“Effective immediately, we are repealing the ridiculous endangerment finding and terminating all additional green emissions standards imposed unnecessarily on vehicle models and engines between 2012 and 2027 and beyond,” Trump said during the Roosevelt Room event at the White House.

“These crippling restrictions were a major factor in driving up car prices to unprecedented levels, and the car that you were getting was not nearly as good.”

Leaders rescinded the agency’s “endangerment finding” from 2009, established under the Obama administration, which declared that six gases—including carbon dioxide, hydrofluorocarbons, methane, nitrous oxide, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride—pose a danger to public health.

The EPA’s 2009 ruling concluded that the gases endangered current and future public health and contributed to climate change. Subsequent regulations based on the finding include vehicle emissions standards, the Clean Power Plan, and other limits on methane, oil, and gas.

“This determination had no basis in fact, none whatsoever, and it had no basis in law,” Trump said, emphasizing the role fossil fuels play in energy production worldwide.

“Yet this radical rule became the legal foundation for the green new scam ... which the Obama and Biden administrations used to destroy countless jobs.”

Officials adopted the regulation following a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA, which held that greenhouse gases constitute air pollution and directed the EPA to assess their potential effects on public health.

Trump called it “a disastrous Obama-era policy that severely damaged the American auto industry and massively drove up prices.”

Vehicle costs increased approximately 22 percent under the Biden administration “without achieving any meaningful impact on the environment but making the car worse,” Trump said.

Administration officials labeled the policy decision as historic.

“This will be the largest deregulatory action in American history, and it will save the American people $1.3 trillion in crushing regulations,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters during a briefing on Feb. 10.

Savings are expected to come from lower automobile costs, she said, with reductions averaging about $2,400 per vehicle.

Trump said the change will benefit consumers by improving the quality of vehicles produced in the country by eliminating the federal government’s pressure on manufacturers to implement climate-related features.

“You’re going to get a better car; a car that starts easier, a car that works better, for far less money,” he said.

Removing the endangerment rule is a central component of Trump’s deregulation strategy, which also seeks to mitigate the economic impact of the Clean Air Act’s greenhouse gas standards.

The president tackled the issue on his first day back in office, signing an executive order titled “Unleashing American Energy,” directing Zeldin to review the ruling.

Zeldin said the endangerment finding was “referred to by some as the holy grail of federal regulatory overreach.”

Officials prioritized dismantling climate change-related guidelines they said were limiting business opportunities and raising consumer prices.

“Alongside President Trump, we are living up to our promises to unleash American energy, lower costs for Americans, revitalize the American auto industry, and work hand-in-hand with our state partners to advance our shared mission,” Zeldin said in a March 2025 statement.

Trump rolled back dozens of energy and climate-related regulations in his first term.

“The carbon footprint is a hoax made up by people with evil intentions, and they’re heading down a path of total destruction,” he told the United Nations General Assembly in September of last year.

“The entire globalist concept of asking successful industrialized nations to inflict pain on themselves and radically disrupt their entire societies must be rejected completely and totally, and it must be immediate.”

Long a champion of domestic energy production, Trump campaigned on a “drill baby drill” agenda, promising to lower inflation by reducing the cost of gasoline and other fuels.

Critics of the rule change argued that Americans will pay a toll for the loss of regulations.

“This action will only lead to more of this pollution, and that will lead to higher costs and real harms for American families,” Fred Krupp, president of the New York-based Environmental Defense Fund, said in a statement.

“The evidence, and the lived experiences of so many Americans, tell us that our health will suffer.”

Views: 1

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2026   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service