The Facts About Fossil Fuel and New England

New England Stuck on Fuel Oil Despite Clean Energy Pledges

  • Despite ambitious renewable energy and emission-reduction targets, New England states heavily rely on fuel oil for home heating.
  • Limited natural gas infrastructure, restrictions on new nuclear power facilities, and slow offshore wind development hinder New England's energy transition.
  • New England leads the U.S. in fuel oil usage for home heating, with 30.5% of households relying on it.
  • New England continues to rely on one of the dirtiest fossil fuels, fuel oil, for space heating in the harsh winters despite the climate and clean energy pledges of many of the states in the region.

    Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine have ambitious renewable energy and emission-reduction targets. Some of these states have taken on Big Oil in lawsuits and state legislation to hold the large international oil and gas companies accountable for climate change.   

    Yet, all of them continue to rely on fuel oil – or heating oil – for space heating, even as this type of fuel is about 30% more polluting than natural gas when burnt.

    This climate goal contradiction is unlikely to go away soon, according to Ariel Cohen, a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council and the Founding Principal of Washington, D.C.-based global risk advisory International Market Analysis.

  • “More good old New England common sense, energy realism, and less virtue signaling would go a long way to resolve the region’s energy bottlenecks,” Cohen wrote in Forbes this week.

  • New England is lacking, and also unwilling to build, enough natural gas infrastructure to have gas delivered from the Marcellus shale and the Appalachia region.

    The northeast region is also one of the several U.S. states that currently have restrictions on the construction of new nuclear power facilities. Nuclear power could help the states with their low-carbon electricity goals, but New England isn’t taking this road, at least not now.

  • Without new nuclear generation and new natural gas pipelines, the northeast faces challenges in greening its energy mix.

    In electricity, ISO New England sources half of its total power generation from natural gas, 20% from nuclear, and just 3% each from solar and wind.

  • The New England coast is a prime resource for offshore wind, but there are few operating projects, and not many more are close to the finish line amid soaring costs and oil supermajors abandoning plans.

    Winter poses challenges to solar generation in the region, while “winter storms that limit solar power can also significantly limit the output of wind generation if high wind speeds force plant operators to shut down in order to protect equipment,” the electricity system provider says.

    During cold snaps, fuel oil is an essential backup generation source for New England’s mix when natural gas is constrained.

    Fuel oil also plays an important role in home heating.

    Currently, New England is the U.S. region with the highest share of households using fuel oil for home heating.

    For example, fuel oil is the most common primary heating fuel used in New Hampshire households – at 40%, per EIA data.

About 82% of U.S. households that heat on fuel oil are in the Northeast.

In Massachusetts, the second-largest heating source for homes is fuel oil, with a 22% share, preceded only by natural gas, with a 50.5% share, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

In New England, utility gas has a 39% share in household heating, followed by fuel oil with 30.5%.

“In New England as a whole, a smaller share of households heat their home using natural gas,” the Commonwealth of Massachusetts says.

“Heating oil remains the second most prominent heating fuel, closely behind natural gas. Lack of natural gas infrastructure in Maine, Vermont, and parts of New Hampshire means less access to gas supplies.”

Ironically, while New England continues to rely on fuel oil, it has very ambitious climate targets.

Vermont, for example, has set out a pathway to obtain 90% of its energy from renewable sources by 2050.

“This ambitious goal calls on all citizens to take actions that will collectively transform the way we use and produce energy in our electric, transportation, and heating sectors,” the state says.

Massachusetts, for its part, has a target to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

Yet, the widespread use of fuel oil for home heating and the fuel acting as backup to natural gas in the ISO New England generation during the coldest winter days aren’t helping the clean energy goals of the Northeast U.S. states.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

Views: 34

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by arthur qwenk on January 16, 2025 at 9:28am

The political narrative of Global Warming, CO2 evil and "Climate change" is a Political Construct , not a scientific one. Politically, "Redistribution of Wealth" has been the mantra for over thirty years now in the  post Cold War World as pushed by  Globalist Elites.

There is a  total lack of understanding of  the concept of dense BTU fuel sources (fossil fuels,nukes) versus unreliable weather dependent low density sources (Wind,Solar).

The Laws Conservation of Energy, Thermodynamics and Physics are just not understood nor politically encouraged to be understood by politicians or the lay public . Our  energy trained engineers only follow that which they are paid to follow and deliver upon.

https://byjus.com/physics/law-of-conservation-of-energy/

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service