That Debate Will Backfire Horribly For Both Kamala Harris And ABC

That Debate Will Backfire Horribly For Both Kamala Harris And ABC

https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/that-debate-will-backf...;

By QTR's Fringe Finance

.

The initial reaction to last night’s debate is that Kamala Harris held her own, albeit with the help of two ABC moderators, and that Trump was “rattled” and on the defense more than he needed to be.

Generally, the debate is being cast as anything but the overwhelming victory for Trump that many predicted.

.

But my guess is that both the dejection from the right and the perceived victory from the left will fade almost immediately as people have a chance to take in everything that really took place.

.

For starters, the times when Trump looked “the worst,” like when moderators tried to debunk him on the Springfield, Ohio, animal/pet killings that were confirmed by 911 calls minutes before the debate, will once again be proven to be factual and on point. 

.

The delivery wasn’t fantastic, but over the last three years, the country’s tolerance for being lied to by the media has shrunk significantly, so it won’t take as long as it normally would for people to see past Trump’s delivery.

People are thinking critically now more than ever and doing their own independent fact-checking more than ever.

In short, people will quickly realize that Trump’s comments sounded justified.

.

And if Americans need a reminder as to why doing their own fact checking is so important, they only need to look at Kamala Harris’s near admission that COVID came out of a lab in China early in the debate.

3 years ago, her side of the aisle would have called you a conspiracy theorist and banned you from social media for saying so.

.

I’ve already written extensively about how the media has lost significant credibility with independent and moderate voters, due to their covering for Joe Biden in the midst of his obvious mental decline. I wrote about it in an article a couple of months ago simply called “We Can Be Lied To About Anything”.

.

After last night, when the average critically thinking, independent or moderate voter begins to emerge from the visceral reaction of who “won” the debate, the picture will start to come into focus. 

And it’ll be a picture of a news network that constantly tried to fact-check Donald Trump, despite Kamala Harris repeating multiple debunked conspiracy theories, like Trump’s Charlottesville comments, which were already debunked by Snopes, and his “bloodbath” comment, which was used in the context of talking about the auto industry.

.

When the average critically thinking American looks at the veracity of the lies that Kamala Harris put forth last night – including 1) lies about Trump’s stance on in vitro fertilization, 2) lies about Trump being associated with Project 2025, and 3) lies about Trump not wanting to secure the border – it’s going to be very difficult to look back on this debate as a victory for her.

And God forbid these same moderate voters were looking for an actual policy stance from Kamala Harris.

.

Despite being well-rehearsed in her narrative and her answers and obviously prepared to answer questions she may or may not have received in advance, while benefiting from two friendly moderators, and a question format that constantly pinned Trump as the antagonist, before David Muir would lead Harris to her answer to reaffirm what the moderators had already decided, she was noticeably devoid of an explanation on her flip-flopping policies.

.

She offered little to no detail on her flip-flops about fracking and her poor performance as border czar, and she failed to take accountability for what happened in Afghanistan, while simultaneously admitting that she approved of how it took place.

.

Similar to, when she was first crowned the “joy” candidate of the Left, there was a luster to her debate performance that is going to wear off very quickly.

Iin my opinion, last night will just be another example of a constantly evolving American people seeing the left-wing media for exactly what it is: a propaganda arm of the Democrat Party.

.

Despite some mumbles and grumbles from the Republican side of the aisle, as soon as the debate ended, I reaffirmed to myself my trust in the American people to think for themselves and to see last night for what it was in hindsight: a set up.

.

I honestly believe that the huge growth of alternative media in this country, and the dismal track record  of establishment Media of horrific embarrassments, like 1) covering up the Hunter Biden laptop story and 2) lying to the American people about the mental acuity of President Joe Biden, have built up a bullshit tolerance for media spin in the average American.

.

More people know today that the left-leaning media has a narrative and lies to them than ever before. 

.

This debate will be different from other ones, because it’ll eventually be looked at in that context. And when people go back and watch how the moderators constantly argued the merits with Trump, while leading Harris in her answers to multiple questions, this debate will be revealed for the biased farce that it was.

And then — mark my words — it will do more harm than good for Kamala Harris.

.

Harris has already come out and asked for a second debate with Trump, ostensibly indicating that she thinks last night was a success, but Trump has answered, he will do it only with neutral moderators; he does not want to be sand-bagged twice.

When the debate ended, the scrutinizing of ABC’s dirty tricks began — and they will be off the table in any future debates.

.

If I were Kamala, I’d be careful what I wish for in asking to step in the ring for a second debate.

Just because the judges saw one round with Trump as a draw doesn’t mean you can go the distance and win by decision.

BREAKING WHISTLE BLOWER REPORT:

Mark Penn, a former senior adviser to Clinton, has called for an internal investigation into ABC, accusing them of rigging the debate against Trump.

“I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate.

I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower.

The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample questions which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked.

Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage.

I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit.

I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.”

CATS ON THE GRILL IN OHIO