Stockman: The US Should Stop Sending Money To Zelensky

Stockman: The US Should Stop Sending Money To Zelensky 


Authored by David Stockman via,

If the truth be told, we are getting sick and tired of the little piss-ant who runs the cess-pool of corruption, tyranny, delusion and death called Ukraine.

This clown—and that’s what he is actually trained as—just can’t seem to stop stridently demanding money, arms and support from the rest of the world and lecturing everyone to fall into line or else.


In his actual clown days, of course, Volodymyr Zelensky was known for the act depicted below.

But when it comes to the collective West, the latter seems to enjoy the fact that the Ukrainian president continues to bang away upon it, relentlessly pounding out a melody of me, me and more.




But lately Zelensky has really gone over the top, peddling the hideous canard, if we don’t enable him to fight "them" over there with everything and all that he demands by way of money and weapons, we will soon bleed and die against "them" over here.

"Putin is going to invade Europe next and maybe America too", nonsense.

It’s actually groundless blithering idiocy, and yet Washington treats him as a brave ally and statesman:

"If any candidate thinks supporting Ukraine is too costly, are they ready to go to war? Are they ready to fight? Send their children? Die?" Zelenskyy said.

"They will have to do it anyway, if NATO enters this war, and if Ukraine fails and Russia occupies us, they will move on to the Baltics or Poland or some other NATO country.

And then the U.S. will have to choose between keeping NATO or entering the war."


Let’s cut to the chase.

No American or NATO soldier is going to be fighting Putin’s army in Poland, Berlin or Belgium because the Russian army ain’t going there. Not in a month of Sundays.

Vlad Putin is no prince of men, but his war aims are limited, rational and clear as a bell.

To wit, as he warned for 15 years, he does not want NATO missiles on his doorstep in Ukraine, just as President Kennedy insisted about Khrushchev’s missiles 100 miles away in Cuba 61 years ago.


Likewise, he wants the Russian-speaking populations of the eastern Donbas region and the Black Sea rim, historically known as "Novorossiya" or New Russia, to have self-governing autonomy and protection from military attack by the anti-Russian Kiev government, as per the Minsk agreements.


After all, those brutal attacks by the Ukraine Army from 2014 to 2022, which killed upwards of 14,000 mostly civilians, occurred nearly continuously for eight years after the Washington-sponsored Maidan coup of February 2014. 

The US had installed hostile pro-Nazi elements in the unelected and illegal government in Kiev, championed by Victoria Nuland and her Washington gaggle of neo-con hegemonists.


In other words, what we have here is a Washington-triggered civil war in an area that has been either a Russian vassal or appendage for centuries and where the term "Ukraine" means "borderlands" in Russian.


And that’s not even the half of it.

The borders of these very "borderlands" do not define a nation or state that was the product of natural development and accretion over centuries.


To the contrary, they are a 20th century artifact concocted by three of the bloodiest tyrants in all of human history—Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev.

The only connection these black-lined borders shown below have to the history of the area is that they were drawn-up for reasons of totalitarian administrative convenience, not as an expression of social, ethnic, religious or economic affinities.

That is to say, Ukraine is a state that was not built to last; and, in fact, it barely outlasted its Soviet rulers after their demise in 1991.


For instance, during the 1994 presidential election the pro-Russian candidate, Leonid Kuchma, defeated the incumbent and strident Ukrainian nationalist, Leonid Kravchuk.


As the map below makes clear, however, Kravchuk won overwhelming majorities of 89-95% in the western Ukraine regions (yellow and orange), which had historically been part of Poland or the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

By the same token, the pro-Russian Leonid Kuchma won the national election, because he racked up similar majorities (blue areas) in the eastern Donbas and southern Novorossiya regions.

In the historic Russian province (since 1783) of Crimea, in fact, Kuchma won 90% of the vote.


Electoral Map of Ukraine’s 1994 Presidential Election

Essentially, the same radical split in the electorate occurred election after election.

During the last legitimate election held within the old communist borders of the country during 2010, the above pattern was replicated.

This time Kuchma’s protege, Viktor Yanukovich, won the election by a hair by virtue of lop-sided margins in the historic Russian-speaking territories of the east and south (blue areas of the map).

On the other side, the Ukrainian nationalist and former prime minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, garnered 80-90% margins in the center and west (red areas of the map).


Not surprisingly, when the pro-Russian winner of the election from the blue regions was illegally ousted from office by Washington's copy d'etat in February 2014, the red area Ukrainian nationalists and their crypto-Nazi allies took control of the Kiev government.

They proceeded to outlaw the Russian language as its first act of government; and soon thereafter launched an 8-y genocide, when the two Donbas provinces declared themselves independent states.



At the end of the day, GOP presidential candidate Ron DeSantis was exactly right.

The war in Ukraine is at bottom a "territorial dispute" that has absolutely nothing to do with the homeland security of America or Zelensky’s ridiculous lie that Putin is coming after NATO next.


And it most certainly has no bearing whatsoever on absurd abstractions like the rule of law and the sanctity of borders.

After all, when it comes to the latter, Washington is far and away the greatest border-violating, regime-changing outlaw in the post-war world.


In some real sense, the post-war peace conference has already been held and the verdict is in.

We are referring to the de facto Ukrainian referendums on the illegitimate state that Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev built, and which the Washington neo-cons and State/Defense/Intel War Party are determined to uphold at any cost, including going to the brink of nuclear war with Russia.


Time and again the Ukrainian electorate effectively voted for partition, as dramatically underscored by the elector maps above.


So send Zelensky packing back to his comedy show and let the blue states of the Ukrainian east and south have their own countries or return to the bosom of Mother Russia


That would end the carnage in a heart-beat, and would stop the senseless slaughter of Ukrainians and Russians alike—a human catastrophe that is beginning to rival the heinous criminality of World War I trench warfare.


The implicit Peace of the Partition, however, could have an additional silver lining.

It would expose the absolute mendacity of the Washington War Party and the fact that it is so desperate to rule the world that it will prop up even utter nincompoops like Zelensky to stay in the business of fighting falsely demonized monsters, who are no threat at all to America’s real homeland security.


As we indicated recently, it’s time to get back to a Fortress America defense policy, which could be funded for a fraction of today’s $900 billion defense budget

And we wouldn’t have to waste our national treasure on idiots like Zelensky

Views: 27


You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine


Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power


Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT


(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.”

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service