Senate Votes to Repeal Biden Rule Restricting Residential Gas Furnaces

Common Sense, as Maine Moves Against Common Sense  (EV's  mandates for example) and to further cripple its Economy with more electrical consumption versus improving natural gas utilization( and impoverishing the  average Mainer with high renewable electrical  unreliables)

The administration’s order would have meant higher costs for 14 percent of low-income households and 20 percent of small business consumers, an industry group said.

Senate Votes to Repeal Biden Rule Restricting Residential Gas Furnaces

The U.S. Senate passed a resolution on May 21 repealing a Biden administration policy forcing many Americans to ditch their gas furnaces and rely on electric ones.

On Sept. 29, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) finalized energy efficiency standards that required residential gas furnaces to achieve “an annual fuel utilization efficiency of 95 percent.”
The standards, set to take effect in 2028, necessitate that in four years, manufacturers must sell only furnaces that transform 95 percent of the fuel into heat. The current industry standard is 80 percent.

“This standard is readily achievable by modern condensing furnaces, which use secondary heat exchangers to capture excess heat from the furnace’s exhaust gases,” the agency said.

While condensing gas furnaces tend to be more efficient than non-condensing variants, they are more expensive. On Feb. 1, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) introduced SJ Res 58, a resolution to block the proposal.

He pointed out that the DOE rule “will effectively ban all non-condensing furnace models, coercing a majority of American households to adopt electric heat pumps or pay thousands of dollars to renovate their homes to meet the requirements of new residential gas furnaces.”

On May 21, the Senate passed the resolution in a 50-45 vote.

While announcing the rule, the DOE justified it by claiming that the new standards for gas furnaces reduce household utility costs by $1.5 billion yearly and lower “greenhouse gas emissions.”

Over a period of 30 years, the standards are predicted to save consumers $24.8 billion.

“As of 2022, residential gas furnaces account for approximately 19 percent of annual residential energy use in the United States. DOE expects that updating efficiency standards for these appliances will, over 30 years, cut carbon emissions by 332 million metric tons.”

This is approximately equal to the combined annual emissions of 42 million homes or roughly 34 percent of American homes, the agency stated.

Sen. Cruz welcomed the passage of SJ Res 58 by the Senate, calling it a “win for Texas families, and indeed families across America” who would otherwise be forced to spend thousands of dollars.
Story continues below advertisement

The standards were proposed and finalized by the Biden DOE as part of a “broader, radical campaign” against fossil fuels, natural gas, and other sources of energy crucial to the American economy and households, he said.

“I am proud that the Senate passed my resolution in a bipartisan fashion, and I urge the House to take up this Resolution expeditiously and pass it.”

Industry Opposition

In comments submitted to the DOE when the gas furnace rule was proposed, the National Caucus of Environmental Legislators backed the measure. They argued that increasing gas efficiency will ease customers’ heating bills.

“Low-to-moderate income households have a disproportionately higher energy burden on average than other households in America,” the caucus wrote.

“The payback period for gas furnaces under this proposed standard is only 2.1 years for low-income consumers, at which point these households would be reaping the full financial benefit from the updated standard.”

Meanwhile, industry groups opposed the measure. In joint comments submitted by several groups, including the American Gas Association (AGA) and the American Public Gas Association (APGA), they warned that the novel efficiency standards would “eliminate an entire category of gas furnace, i.e., noncondensing furnaces, currently used in millions of homes.”

At present, around 40 percent of non-weatherized natural gas furnaces sold to customers are non-condensing, they wrote, adding that millions of homes and businesses were designed for such furnaces.

“DOE’s data shows that the proposal will result in higher overall costs for 15 percent of senior-only households, 14 percent of low-income households, and 20 percent of small business consumers. … DOE should not issue a rule with such unacceptable impacts on low-income households, seniors, and energy insecure consumers.”

In December last year, the AGA filed a lawsuit against DOE for making non-condensing natural gas furnaces unavailable to most American consumers.
On Feb. 8, the APGA announced it was backing efforts in the House and Senate to block the furnace rule. The association accused the DOE of failing to provide a “transparent analysis and sufficient economic justification” for implementing the energy efficiency standards.

Stuart Saulters, APGA’s vice president of government relations, called the DOE policy “especially concerning” as it could force “vulnerable, underserved communities,” potentially to shift to less affordable electric furnaces, which also tend to be less efficient than the direct use of natural gas.

On May 21, the day SJ Res 58 was put up for vote in the Senate, the Biden administration issued a statement saying it “strongly opposes” the bill and that the president would veto it.
Story continues below advertisement

“DOE determined that these standards will result in significant conservation of energy, are technologically feasible, and economically justified, providing an estimated $1.5 billion each year in savings on household utility bills—with an average household that upgrades from a legacy model saving an estimated $500 over the new furnace’s lifetime,” the administration said.

“Passage of S.J. Res. 58 would eliminate these commonsense energy efficiency standards that promote choices for consumers to help them save money, prevent waste of electricity and gas, and strengthen energy security.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/senate-votes-to-repeal-biden-rule-...

Views: 41

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on May 28, 2024 at 12:57pm
Migrant Resettlement Agency Chronically Over-billed MaineCare, Has Not Repaid Taxpayers: Audit
Comment by Willem Post on May 25, 2024 at 3:02pm

In Puerto Rico, where people are impoverished, the wind/solar merchants of evil, $convinced the local Mafia to have wind turbines and solar panels, so they could show themselves to the gullible people as “progressive”, be “energy independent”

Then, the first hurricane arrived and wiped out all the wind turbines and solar panels, in addition to the usual damage.

However, the loans incurred to pay for all of it were still held by European banks, who demanded payment.

The people of Puerto Rico were super-screwed up and down and sideways,
Many came to the US to be bailed out by government programs run by idiot-led Democrats, who are in favor of expensive, highly subsidized dysfunctional wind and solar, paid for by printing $billions of dollars

Trump needs to win by a landslide to wipe out all the bull manure of the Obama/Biden years

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service