Primary Energy Sources Requiring Combustion
Source energy is the energy taken from the earth, such as from a well, a mine, a forest. The energy for exploration, extraction, processing and transport is used to convert the source energy to primary energy for the US economy. The US electrical system uses about 40% of all primary energy.
- Source energy is the energy taken from coalmines, oil and gas wells, and forests for conversion (by means of combustion) to electricity and heat.
- Primary energy = source energy - energy used for exploration, extraction, processing and transport of fuels (coal, oil, gas, biofuels, wastes, etc.) to fuel users, such as electricity generating plants, process plants, buildings and vehicles, etc.
- Consumed energy by users = electricity fed to grid + electricity imports fed to grid + fuel to process plants, buildings and vehicles, etc.
- Gross electricity generation = primary energy (fuel to power plants) x conversion efficiency.
- Net electricity generation = gross electricity generation - plant self-use = electricity fed to grid.
- Plant efficiency = energy out/energy in = electricity fed to grid/gross electricity generation
- Electricity at user meters = electricity fed to grid - transmission & distribution losses.
For exploration and extraction mostly diesel and electricity are used.
For processing mostly diesel, natural gas and electricity are used.
For transport mostly diesel is used.
Primary Energy Sources Not Requiring Combustion
Examples of such primary energy sources are nuclear, hydro, geothermal, solar and wind. Their primary energy factors are set at 1.0, according to the Direct Equivalent Method used by the UN.
Other entities, such as the EIA, BP, World Bank, etc., use other methods, which assign artificial factors to those energy sources, but they are not part of this article.
Primary Energy of US Grid
The PE factors are shown in table 1 for the US grid. They were obtained from this website. Google the title and the article displays as a PDF.
“Primary Energy Demand of Renewable Energy Carriers”. See page 12, left column in table.
The CO2 is only the combustion CO2, i.e., upstream is not included. See URLs.
The combustion CO2 of hydro; geo; solar and wind were set at zero.
The combustion CO2 of muni refuse; solid biomass (such as wood/pellets); biogas (such as landfill methane) & bio-liquids (such as ethanol) were not counted, per international agreement.
NOTE: Hydro, geo, solar and wind have upstream CO2 emissions. That CO2 is counted as part of A to Z, lifecycle, cradle to grave analyses.
NOTE: In case of ethanol from corn, the upstream CO2/gallon is actually greater than the combustion CO2/gallon. That CO2 is counted as part of A to Z, lifecycle, cradle to grave analyses.
NOTE:
1 quad = 10^15 Btu
1 quad = 293.071070 TWh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_in_the_United_States
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Energy_Flow_US_...
https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.php
CO2 Emissions of an EV: Almost all EV owners do not have a wall meter dedicated to measure the kWh charged into an EV. They use the vehicle meter to calculate their electricity consumption.
Vehicle meter = 12000 miles/y x 0.300 = 3600 kWh/y
Vehicle meter, CO emissions = 3600 x 520 = 1.872 million gram/y. See table 1.
Wall meter = 12000 miles/y x 1.125 x 0.300 = 4050 kWh/y purchased from utility.
Wall meter, CO2 emissions = 4050 x 463 = 1.872 million gram/y. See table 1.
Direct Equivalent Method |
Factor |
PE |
PE |
To grid |
CO2 |
To grid |
To meters |
In EV batteries |
Table 1/US Grid/2017 |
Combustion |
Combustion |
Combustion |
Combustion |
||||
T&D 6.5% |
Charge 12.5% |
|||||||
quad |
TWh |
TWh |
million mt |
g/kWh |
g/kWh |
g/kWh |
||
Coal |
0.3245 |
12.700 |
3722.00 |
1207.90 |
1207.1 |
999 |
||
Oil |
0.3427 |
0.210 |
61.54 |
21.09 |
30.5 |
1446 |
||
Gas |
0.4603 |
9.540 |
2795.90 |
1287.02 |
506.4 |
393 |
||
Total Fossil |
0.3824 |
22.450 |
6579.45 |
2516.02 |
1744.0 |
693 |
738 |
830 |
Nuclear |
1.0000 |
2.747 |
804.95 |
804.95 |
||||
Hydro |
1.0000 |
1.024 |
300.05 |
300.05 |
||||
Geo |
1.0000 |
0.055 |
15.98 |
15.98 |
||||
Solar |
1.0000 |
0.181 |
52.96 |
52.96 |
||||
Wind |
1.0000 |
0.868 |
254.25 |
254.25 |
||||
Muni Refuse |
0.1770 |
|||||||
Biomass, solid |
0.2860 |
0.520 |
185.38 |
53.02 |
||||
Biogas & bio-liquids |
0.2620 |
|||||||
Total RE |
1.0000 |
2.648 |
687.29 |
687.29 |
||||
Imports |
1.0000 |
0.060 |
17.58 |
17.58 |
||||
Total |
27.905 |
8178.15 |
4014.80 |
1744.0 |
434 |
463 |
520 |
Primary Energy of NE Grid
The below table 2 is for the NE grid. Generation and CO2 data were obtained from the URLs.
https://www.iso-ne.com/about/key-stats/resource-mix/
https://www.iso-ne.com/static-assets/documents/2018/01/2016_emissio...
The NE grid is significantly “cleaner “, has much less g CO2/kWh, than the US grid. That is largely due to the high percentages of gas, nuclear and hydro, which contribute about 90% of all electricity generated in NE.
The CO2/kWh is 454 g/lb x 36389000 US ton x 2000 lb/US ton/(102532 GWh x 1000000 kWh/GWh) = 322 g. See table 2.
ISO-NE estimates NE generation with CO2 at 59% and without CO2 at 41%.
NOTE:
Combustion CO2 was 37.468 million US ton in 2016. Generation was 105572 GWh.
Combustion CO2 for 2017 was estimated a 37.468 million US ton x 102532/105572 = 36.389 million US ton.
CO2 Emissions of an EV: Almost all EV owners do not have a wall meter dedicated to measure the kWh charged into an EV. They use the vehicle meter to calculate their electricity consumption.
Vehicle meter = 12000 miles/y x 0.300 = 3600 kWh/y
Vehicle meter, CO emissions = 3600 x 327 = 1.1772 million gram/y. See table 2.
Wall meter = 12000 miles/y x 1.125 x 0.300 = 4050 kWh/y purchased from utility.
Wall meter, CO2 emissions = 4050 x 291 = 1.1772 million gram/y. See table 2.
Direct Equivalent Method |
Factor |
PE |
To Grid |
CO2 |
To grid |
To meters |
In EV batteries |
Table 2/NE Grid/2017 |
Combustion |
Combustion |
Combustion |
Combustion |
|||
2016 |
T&D 6.5% |
Charging 12.5% |
|||||
GWh |
GWh |
million US ton |
g/kWh |
g/kWh |
g/kWh |
||
Coal |
0.3245 |
5190 |
1684 |
||||
Oil |
0.3427 |
2031 |
696 |
||||
Gas |
0.4603 |
106882 |
49198 |
||||
Total fossil |
0.4520 |
114103 |
51578 |
||||
Nuclear |
1.0000 |
31538 |
31538 |
||||
Hydro |
1.0000 |
8572 |
8572 |
||||
- Geo |
1.0000 |
0 |
0 |
||||
- Solar |
1.0000 |
880 |
880 |
||||
- Wind |
1.0000 |
3280 |
3280 |
||||
- Muni Refuse |
0.1770 |
17881 |
3165 |
||||
- Biomass, solid |
0.2860 |
10538 |
3014 |
||||
- Biogas & bio-liquids |
0.2620 |
1874 |
491 |
||||
- Steam |
1.0000 |
0 |
0 |
||||
Total RE |
0.3143 |
34454 |
10830 |
||||
Other |
1.0000 |
14 |
14 |
||||
Total Generation |
0.5434 |
188681 |
102532 |
36.389 |
322 |
343 |
386 |
Net Flow over External Ties |
1.0000 |
20243 |
20243 |
||||
- Québec |
1.0000 |
14401 |
14401 |
||||
- New Brunswick |
1.0000 |
4306 |
4306 |
||||
- New York |
1.0000 |
1536 |
1536 |
||||
Pumping Load |
1.0000 |
-1716 |
-1716 |
||||
Net Energy for Load |
0.5842 |
207208 |
121059 |
36.389 |
273 |
291 |
327 |
Primary Energy of Vermont Grid
The below table 3 is for the VT grid. Generation and CO2 data were obtained from the Energy Action Network.
The Vermont grid is significantly “cleaner “, has much less g CO2/kWh, than the US and NE grid. That is largely due to the high percentages of VT-generated RE, purchased nuclear, purchased H-Q hydro (via a connection that is not monitored by ISO-NE), which contribute about 72% of the total supply to the VT grid.
Fossil CO2 = 322 x 1618775 x 1000/1000000 = 521246 metric ton, as allocated to VT by ISO-NE.
ISO-NE estimates NE generation with CO2 at 59% and without CO2 at 41%
VT estimates its electricity supply with CO2 at 40.6% and without CO2 at 59.6%
CO2 Emissions of an EV: Almost all EV owners do not have a wall meter dedicated to measure the kWh charged into an EV. They use the vehicle meter to calculate their electricity consumption.
Vehicle meter = 12000 miles/y x 0.300 = 3600 kWh/y
Vehicle meter, CO emissions = 3600 x 104, table 3 = 0.3744 million gram/y. See table 2.
Wall meter = 12000 miles/y x 1.125 x 0.300 = 4050 kWh/y purchased from utility.
Wall meter, CO2 emissions = 4050 x 92, table 2 = 0.3744 million gram/y
Direct Equivalent Method |
|||||||
Table 3/VT Grid/2016 |
|||||||
Energy Action Network |
To grid |
To meters |
In EV batteries |
||||
Vermont 2016 Electricity Sources |
Combustion |
Combustion |
Combustion |
||||
2018 update |
Factor |
PE |
PE |
To Grid |
2016 |
T&D 6.5% |
Charge 12.5% |
% |
million Btu |
MWh |
MWh |
g/kWh |
g/kWh |
g/kWh |
|
Oil/Distillate |
0.3189 |
77987 |
22857 |
7288 |
|||
Gas |
0.4319 |
140350 |
41134 |
17766 |
|||
ISO-NE Non-RE |
0.4319 |
12590386 |
3690031 |
1593721 |
|||
Total fossil |
0.4312 |
12808723 |
3754022 |
1618775 |
322 |
343 |
386 |
Nuclear |
0.3281 |
8046529 |
2358303 |
773705 |
|||
H-Q system mix* |
0.9600 |
4790000 |
1403869 |
1347714 |
|||
Hydro* |
1.0000 |
2457967 |
720389 |
720389 |
|||
Solar* |
1.0000 |
876318 |
256834 |
256834 |
|||
Wind* |
1.0000 |
1628658 |
477332 |
477332 |
|||
Landfill methane/Muni Refuse* |
1.0000 |
327327 |
95934 |
95934 |
|||
Biomass, solid (wood)* |
0.2275 |
6982047 |
2046321 |
465470 |
|||
Farm Biogas & bio-liquids* |
1.0000 |
77364 |
22674 |
22674 |
|||
ISO-NE RE* |
1.0000 |
855945 |
250863 |
250863 |
|||
Net Energy for Load |
0.5295 |
38850878 |
11386541 |
6029690 |
86 |
92 |
104 |
Total RE* |
0.6794 |
17995626 |
5274216 |
3583301 |
59.4% |
||
Total Non-RE |
0.4002 |
20855252 |
6112325 |
2446389 |
40.5% |
NOTE:
- Landfill methane/Muni refuse should be 0.1770, instead of 1.0000
- Biomass, solid (wood) of 0.2860 used by “Primary Energy Demand of Renewable Energy Carriers” (See page 12, left column in table), is for very efficient biomass plants, but should be 0.2275 in case of Vermont’s very old McNeil and Ryegate plants.
- Farm biogas & bio-liquids should be 0.2620, instead of 1.0000
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine