/>The Global Nuclear Power ComebacK
The Diablo Canyon nuclear plant near Avila Beach, Calif., Dec. 1, 2021.
(photo missing)Nuke Up! Real Dispatchable Power is on the Way...Renewable Unreliables Are Done!
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a longtime nuclear-energy critic, said in June she had changed her mind about California’s last nuclear plant, at Diablo Canyon. Closing it, she said, makes little sense “under these circumstances.”
Even before the current global energy crisis, experts warned for years that nuclear phaseouts like Germany’s would crunch energy supply at a time when countries are shifting from fossil fuels to meet climate mandates. Nuclear energy has been on the decline for decades. In 1996 it provided about 17% of global energy production; today it’s around 10%. After the 2011 Fukushima accident, anti-nuclear sentiment swept the world, with Japan and Germany leading the way to complete nuclear phaseouts. In the U.S., 12 reactors have been closed since 2012. The Energy Information Administration projects that the nuclear share of American power generation will decline to 11% by 2050, from 20% today.
Some countries are reconsidering. The war in Ukraine has led even fervent nuclear critics to face the reality that trading domestic nuclear energy production for reliance on Russian fossil fuels has been counterproductive. A prime example is the European Union’s recent decision to classify nuclear energy as “green,” potentially opening up billions of euros in investment.
EU member states are also beginning to act. Belgium’s Green Party did an about-face to extend the life of the country’s remaining two reactors by a decade. Poland is building its first plant, while the Czech Republic plans several reactors. Though France once flirted with shutting down 14 of its 58 reactors at the time, the country is now doubling down on nuclear energy, including next-generation designs. The Dutch government is moving toward construction of two new plants in response to war-induced energy shortages. The Netherlands has even urged Germany to keep its remaining nuclear plants online, though Berlin remains stubborn.
The story is similar in Asia and the Pacific. Japan plans to reverse its denuclearization by bringing nine nuclear reactors fully online this winter, while its 2030 emissions goal is based on restarting a total of 30 reactors, according to a senior official. South Korea recently announced its ambition to boost nuclear generation by 30% over eight years. Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines are all investing in nuclear energy. Last month Indonesia unveiled legislation to begin building its first nuclear power station. China has slowly but surely established itself as the world’s largest investor in new nuclear energy projects.
The U.S., too, seems to be changing course. In April President Biden announced $6 billion in aid to struggling plants such as Diablo Canyon. Private investors and government agencies are pouring billions into next-generation nuclear designs called small modular reactors. West Virginia recently repealed its decades-long ban on nuclear power for that purpose. Wyoming convinced Bill Gates’s company TerraPower to build its first plant there, while NuScale, the company that created the first commercial small modular reactor design to be officially approved in the U.S., is building several next-generation reactors at the Idaho National Laboratory.
Antinuclear activists have spent years fomenting fear about atomic power. Many countries took the bait and prematurely closed plants that were producing clean, reliable energy. Now, reality is forcing them to rethink. A report published by the International Energy Agency last month concludes that the “policy landscape is changing, opening up opportunities for a nuclear comeback.” Countries seem to be waking up to the realization that they can’t meet their climate, energy, and national security goals without nuclear energy.
Mr. Barnard is national policy director at the American Conservation Coalition.
Views: 89
Comment
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2024 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine