Net Zero Is Not Sustainable
A good tell of the ridiculous hoax we face as our delusional, global oligarchs force us to into a net zero, Orwellian hellscape is the unsustainable resource puzzle surrounding the raw materials required to build EV's - it's a joke. Here's a run down of the insurmountable requirements and what is obviously not doable.
Visualizing net zero for EVs:
Going net zero will trigger the biggest mining boom of copper, nickel, and lithium in history according to Professor Simon Michaux, an Associate Professor of Geometallurgy at the Geological Survey of Finland.
Making enough wind turbines, solar panels, batteries and electric vehicles to replace "fossil" fuels will require over 4.5 billion tons of copper.
The problem: The world only mined 24 million tons of copper in 2019, meaning it will take 189 years to produce enough copper to go net zero at current rates of production.
The world will need just under one billion tons of nickel to make enough renewables to replace "fossil" (lie) fuels.
But in 2019, the world only mined 2.4 million tons of nickel - meaning it will take 400 years to produce enough to go net zero at current rates of production.
The situation gets even worse when it comes to lithium, cobalt and rare earth metals.
It will take 9,920 years to produce enough lithium to go net zero at current rates of production.
It will take 1,733 years to produce enough cobalt to go net zero - most of which would come from Chinese-owned child mines in the Congo.
These limitations will lead to scarcity which will lead to pricing automobiles (mobility) beyond the means of the average citizen. Mobility and autonomy will be seriously restricted giving more control to whatever dictatorial government is running the show.
Views: 81
Comment
-
Comment by Willem Post on February 9, 2023 at 9:19am
-
Soros subsidizes FACT CHECKER sites, which are PAID to find all sorts of ways to lie/deny the facts.
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine