Secretary General of NATO, told reporters in 2014, “Russia, as part of their sophisticated information and disinformation operations, engaged actively with so-called nongovernmental organizations—environmental organizations working against shale gas—to maintain dependence on imported Russian gas.
Former Secretary of State and then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, with access to intelligence reports, made a private speech in 2014, according to documents from WikiLeaks, which included statements about the struggles of dealing with Russian-backed environmental groups. According to a media report, Secretary Clinton said the following: “We [the State Department and the U.S.] were up against Russia pushing oligarchs and others to buy media. We were even up against phony environmental groups, and I’m a big environmentalist, but these were funded by the Russians to stand against any effort, ‘Oh that pipeline, that fracking, that whatever will be a problem for you,’ and a lot of the money supporting that message was coming from Russia.”
Russian-sponsored agents funneled money to U.S. environmental organizations in an attempt to portray energy companies in a negative way and disrupt domestic energy markets.
To understand this you just have to understand that most of the more vocal and radical environmentalists aren’t environmentalists at all. They’re anti-capitalist activist who glommed on to the environmental movement after the collapse of communism. They needed a platform from which to promote their anti-capitalist agenda; and environmentalism certainly made a better home base than the Kremlin. Oh! So you think I’m full of ProgSqueeze on this environmentalist/anti-capitalist thing.? Let’s just look at two of the co-founders of Greenpeace, Paul Watson and Patrick Moore. Patrick Moore first. He left Greenpeace, the group he helped found in 1971, in the late 1980’s. Here’s an excerpt from an article from the CBS Interactive Business Network Resource Library written by John Elvin in 1997 about Moore: He (Patrick Moore) says the fall of communism brought an influx of anti-corporate extremism to the environmental movement because, "suddenly, the international peace movement had a lot less to do. Pro-Soviet groups in the West were discredited. Many of their members moved into the environmental movement, bringing with them their eco-Marxism and pro-Sandinista sentiments. "A lot of those in the peace movement were anti-American and, to an extent, pro-Soviet. By virtue of their anti-Americanism, they tended to sometimes favor the communist approach. A lot of those people, a lot of those social activists, moved into the environmental movement once the peace movement was no longer relevant." Social activists, he suggests, "are now using the rhetoric of environmentalism to promote other collectivist agendas, such as class struggle -- which I personally believe is a legitimate area, but I don't believe it's legitimate to mix it up with environmentalism." Wake up, folks! The environmental movement is not what it seems. It has been hijacked. True environmentalists out there need to purge their organizations of these anti-capitalist hacks so that they can be taken seriously again. Why do they oppose Keystone? Because Keystone would bring oil – oil is the blood of capitalism. Cut off the blood supply and you kill the capitalist.
Climate Movement Drops Mask, Admits Communist Agenda
The "climate change" "crisis" is now nothing but the latest justification for "total revolution" and getting rid of capitalism forever.
Below you will find irrefutable proof that communist ideologies, organizations and phraseologies have completely moved to the forefront of the "climate change" movement. (I was originally tempted to say that the communists, as they are wont to do, have merely "co-opted" environmentalism. But that would imply that the goal of global warming scaremongering was something other than "destroying capitalism" in the first place. At this point I now know that destroying capitalism has always been the goal; the only thing that changed on Sunday is that the mask was dropped.)
That is really nothing new. Communists and Liberals who tended to be socialist leaning/communist were not only manipulating but organizing and getting into power of environmental groups a long time ago. The difference today is internet and social media's effectiveness and transparency. Remember Bill Ayers? He was an avowed communist. I know, because I met him, way back when....
© 2023 Created by Webmaster. Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine