Will this shed light on why sometimes Maine's newspapers will run four articles that center on or at least allude to "climate change"? Will it shed light on the reason that articles about wind projects seldom criticize these projects? Bookmark the site now, return regularly and find out.
By Ted Cohen February 13, 2025
Just when you thought all hope for real-time media watchdogging was lost comes a blog devoted to Portland Press Herald shenanigans.
The newly unveiled Reddit social-media site features all things screwy at the Maine Trust for Local Snooze.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PortlandPressHerald/s/9o2TsJNj1Q
When The Maine Wire’s Edward Tomic exposed the trust’s cozy relationship with a drug-trafficking suspect, the Reddit watchdog realized it had found a delicious meaty bone.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PortlandPressHerald/s/kK8QBy36d7
So have no fear Reddit’s Press Herald watchdog is near.
Tired of the state’s largest newspaper hierarchy spewing pablum? Perish your skepticism.
https://www.reddit.com/r/PortlandPressHerald/s/UlcEzrgDAl
See you there. Have no fear, the blog dog is here!
Editor’s note: Ted Cohen is a former longtime Portland Press Herald staffer.
Weblink:
https://www.themainewire.com/2025/02/maines-troubled-portland-press...
Comment
The swampiest people seem to be the most angry about DOGE
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/former-rnc-chair-who-now-w...
If an obscure nonprofit received hundreds of millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars, trained thousands of journalists, influenced media outlets worldwide, and quietly scrubbed its leadership and key records from the internet—wouldn’t you want to know why?
That’s precisely what’s happening with Internews Network, a so-called “independent” media organization almost entirely bankrolled by USAID since 2008.
Through extensive U.S. government funding, Internews has trained journalists, produced media content, and shaped global narratives, all while supporting censorship initiatives under the guise of combating “misinformation.”
Internews has been systematically erasing its public-facing disclosures. Critical information about its governance, leadership, and programming has been removed or modified—particularly around Inauguration Day.
The executive and legislative branches must investigate this purging of key intelligence about the organization.
These actions suggest a concerted effort to limit public access to information about Internews’ leadership, funding sources, and ideological agenda.
If Internews is genuinely committed to press freedom, why is it selectively managing what information is accessible to the public?
Key Findings from the Recent Form 990
Internews’ most recent public Form 990 spotlights several key facets of its funding and operations:
The USAID Gravy Train: Hundreds of Millions in Taxpayer Dollars
Internews markets itself as a champion of independent journalism, but the numbers tell a different story. A 2020 federal audit revealed that tens of millions of dollars flow from USAID directly to Internews annually. This wasn’t a one-time grant—over 95% of its funding has come from U.S. government sources in recent years, as confirmed by ProPublica’s nonprofit audit report and USAspending.gov.
Economic Dependency: Internews Can’t Survive Without U.S. Taxpayer Dollars
The 2023 audit report for Internews confirms that the organization depends nearly entirely on U.S. government funding. In recent years, over 90% of its revenue came from U.S. government grants and cooperative agreements.
Even Internews itself admits that without U.S. taxpayer funding, it would struggle to function:
Any interruption of these relationships (i.e., the failure to renew grant agreements or withholding of funds) would adversely affect Internews Network’s ability to finance ongoing operations.
Internews is not an independent nonprofit—it is a government-funded media entity whose survival depends on continuous taxpayer subsidies.
Scrubbing the Truth: What Are They Hiding?
Internews has systematically erased, altered, or obscured key information from its website, particularly close to Inauguration Day 2025. This raises serious questions about what the organization is trying to conceal.
The following pages were archived before being removed or altered:
Clinton Global Initiative Partnership: A Disappearing Act?
Internews launched a significant partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), which involved launching a $10 million media fund in 2023.
The Clinton Foundation still publicly lists the partnership on its website: Clinton Foundation Press Release.
Why Hide a $10 Million Deal?
Curiously, Internews’s current sponsor page still lists major left-wing donors—including the Open Society Foundations (George Soros), the Ford Foundation, and the MacArthur Foundation—but does not include the Clinton Global Initiative.
Why would Internews downplay or scrub references to a multi-million-dollar partnership with the Clinton network while continuing to highlight other left-wing donors?
The removal of these public-facing disclosures strongly suggests that Internews is hiding something. If the organization has nothing to conceal, why scrub critical pages about its leadership, funding, and affiliations?
No More Taxpayer-Funded Secrecy
A nonprofit that relies on U.S. government funding must be fully transparent about who runs it, where its money goes, and its true agenda. Yet, Internews has systematically purged key information, making meaningful oversight nearly impossible.
This is a direct challenge to Congress and the Trump administration:
The time for action is now.
No more hiding. No more funding. No more taxpayer-backed media manipulation shrouded from accountability.
Charlton Allen is an attorney, former chief executive officer, and chief judicial officer of the North Carolina Industrial Commission. He is the founder of the Madison Center for Law & Liberty, Inc., editor of The American Salient, and the host of the Modern Federalist podcast. X: @CharltonAllenNC
Weblink:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/02/the_usaid_internew...
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine