In New Hampshire, Republican Senate candidate Don Bolduc said last week that more spending is not the answer to improving conditions in Ukraine.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has indicated that if Republicans retake control of the House in next month's midterm elections, the GOP will likely oppose sending more aid to Ukraine in its war with Russia, the Washington Post reports.
The US has authorized upward of $60 billion in aid to Ukraine, along with over $18.2 billion in military assistance since January 2021.
In May, 2022, the Senate voted to finalize over $40 billion in new military and humanitarian assistance - a package which many Republican lawmakers voted against.
On Friday, an additional $725 million in military assistance was announced - including more ammunition for HIMARS rockets, precision-guided artillery rounds, antitank weapons and Humvees, according to the Pentagon.
"There’s the things [the Biden administration] is not doing domestically," McCarthy told Punchbowl News. "Not doing the border, and people begin to weigh that. Ukraine is important, but at the same time, it can’t be the only thing they do, and it can’t be a blank check."
McCarthys comments come days after the latest NYT/Siena college poll reveals that just:
Only 2% of likely voters think the war in Ukraine is the most important issue facing the country
44% of likely voters think the economy (job security, inadequacy of unemployment benefits, out-of-control deficit spending) and inflation (food, heating and gasoline, mortgage rates) are the two most important issues.
Pushback
Notwithstanding GOP war hawks like Mitch McConnell (R-KY), McCarthy isn't the only Republican who's publicly opposed more Ukraine aid.
"I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually," said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who's in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio, adding that he wants "the Ukrainians to be successful," but not through more US funding.
"We cannot fund a long-term military conflict that I think ultimately has diminishing returns for our own country," he told ABC, adding "I think we’re at the point where we’ve given enough money in Ukraine, I really do. … The Europeans need to step up. And frankly, if the Ukrainians and the Europeans, more importantly, knew that America wasn’t going to foot the bill, they might actually step up."
Meanwhile, Arizona Republican Senate nominee Blake Masters said in May that the money would be better spent securing the southern border with a wall.
"Under Joe Biden, it’s always America last," he said in a video. "Let’s be clear about what this means. It means no cease-fire. It means another foreign war where we pay for everything. Many more thousands of people will die. There’s no resolution, no end in sight. The risk of course is that a proxy war can escalate into an all-out nuclear war between nuclear powers."
In New Hampshire, Republican Senate candidate Don Bolduc said last week that more spending is not the answer to improving conditions in Ukraine.
“We must hold the administration accountable,” he told New Hampshire’s ABC affiliate. “We just can’t print this money. It’s money we don’t have, and it’s equipment that’s being thrown at a problem without any strategy, without any policy, and it’s not going to get the job done.”
These Republicans could join Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who in May temporarily held up $40 billion of aid to Ukraine, saying, “you can’t save Ukraine by dooming the U.S. economy.”
Nevada Republican Senate nominee Adam Laxalt tweeted in May that the $40 billion U.S. aid to Ukraine was a “shockingly abhorrent proposal.” -WaPo
After McCarthy's comments, outgoing never-Trump, RINO Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) tweeted "What in the absolute bloody hell is happening to GOPLeader," while Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, warned, if the GOP wins back the house, Ukraine aid would be in jeopardy.
"I just see a freight train coming, and that is Trump and his operation turning against aid for Ukraine," he told MSNBC.
"House Republicans, if they were to take the majority, being preternaturally against anything Joe Biden is for — including the war in Ukraine and treasonous open borders, and helicoptering deficit-spending money all over the US— and there being a real crisis, where the House Republican majority would refuse to support additional aid to Ukraine."
Comment
EU Dependence on Russian Oil, Gas, Coal, etc.
Trump told the Germans, they were too dependent on Russian gas, in 2018.
They pooh-poohed and laughed at him.
The Germans are not laughing now, as they face de-industrialization on a massive scale.
Assimilating Ukraine into the Western World
Europe was foolishly supporting the US-instigated/financed, color revolution, in Ukraine, in 2014, which violently ousted a democratically elected President.
"Fuck-the-EU" Ms. Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary of State, a former Ukrainian, was one of the on-site organizers of the Kiev Coup.
https://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/the-plot-is-thickening...
The scenario would be to:
1) Turn Ukraine, and most of East Europe, into a NATO armed camp to "bark at the gates of Russia", per the Pope.
2) Implement a State/Defense Department dream scenario, i.e., weaken Russia by:
- Forcing it to fight a NATO-weaponized Ukraine “for as long as it takes”
- Imposing sanctions to destroy the Russian economy
- Undermine political stability in Russia, etc., with foreign-financed NGOs, to foster opposition groups, and achieve regime changes
- Break up centuries-old Russia in independent states that would be more easily manipulated
- Take control of Russia’s vast natural resources, which would be of great benefit to the Western world, especially the resource-starved EU/UK.
3) France, Germany, Ukraine, etc., stonewalling Russia regarding implementing the Minsk accords, for 8 years, while:
- Building up the Ukraine army with NATO training and weaponry
- Tattoo-ed, Neo-Nazi "army personnel" performing a punishing genocide of about 12,000 Donbass men, women and children, which was not, or insufficiently, reported by the US/UK/EU media. The EU does not have the moral right to accuse Russia of committing war crimes in Ukraine, because the EU ignored the Kiev’s nationalists shelling and killing of civilians in Donbass, for 8 years.
- Kiev nationalists, with elements of neo-NAZI-extremists, armed with all sorts of NATO weapons, are ruining Ukraine, because they refused to give "autonomy-while-being-part-of-Ukraine" to the Donbass area; a Minsk Agreement requirement.
The Donbass area is populated almost entirely by Russian-speakers, who, while enduring genocide for 8 years:
- Had been living in the Donbass area, for hundreds of years, before the state of Ukraine even existed.
- Had become "Ukrainian" in 1990, without being asked to vote on it
- Had their Russian Orthodox Church taken away from them by Kiev’s nationalists
- Had their Russian language declared illegal by Kiev’s nationalists
- Had their Russian language media replaced by Ukrainian language media by Kiev’s nationalists
NOTE: The US/EU-instigated/financed color revolutions in Belarus (big fertilizer/potash exporter) and Kazakhstan (big oil/gas exporter) in 2021 and 2022, to effect regime changes and assimilate them into the Western world, were unsuccessful.
Europe/UK Lack Natural Resources
Clueless EU bureaucrats, whose first priority is creating the appearance of being green, imposed US-demanded sanctions on Russia, resulting in a multi-year economic recession in Europe
Europe has no choice but to outsource its natural gas deliveries to the US, etc., which is charging 3 to 4 times for its LNG, as Russia was charging for its pipeline gas!!
It is highly likely, the US/UK-dominated NATO blew up Russia’s Nordstream 1 and 2 pipelines, to eliminate any future low-cost competition from Russia.
The short-sighted EU bureaucrats have screwed Europeans big-time
Europeans are burning their own household trash to stay warm.
Europeans are cutting down CO2-absorbing trees in the forests to stay warm
How good is that for the environment?
Europe’s expensive wind, solar, battery, etc., policies, to “save the planet”, have done far more damage to the planet and to Europe’s economy than foreseen
Europe Teetering on Economic Ruin
Energy-intensive factories are being shuttered, many of them permanently.
In 2022, the UK claimed the highest household electricity bills in Europe; that “honor” was earlier claimed by Denmark and Germany, both wind, solar, battery, etc., mavens.
The UK’s National Grid warned British households to prepare for blackouts between 4 pm and 7 pm on "really, really cold" weekdays in January and February.
Business bankruptcies in the UK are now at their highest level since the 2009 financial crisis.
China halted all resales of LNG sourced from Russian gas; that LNG typically would end up in Europe.
The EU's sanctions on Russian oil and gas will shut down Russian oil delivery to Europe in just over a month.
Russia will sell its oil elsewhere for rubles, or that country's currency, because dollars and euros are worthless to Russia, because of the pre-meditated sanctions
https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/russia-leans-turkey-india-chi...
The EU sanctions are an "Economic Jonestown"
US/UK/EU climate nincompoops are celebrating the economic and human devastation as winter closes in.
US LNG shipments into Europe are pricing 3 to 4 times US prices; a very nice payday for the well-connected.
New England faces gas shortages due to a New York State ban of pipeline expansion to serve New England
The 1920 US Jones Act bans LNG shipments from Louisiana ports to Boston Harbor
US/UK destruction of Nord Stream 1 and 2 prevents Germany from making a gas deal with Russia
Clueless EU bureaucrats are craping-and-bowing to the clueless Biden regime to protect Europe’s $15 trillion of investments in the US, and its $trillion-plus annual balance of payment surpluses with the US.
Regime Change and Breaking Up Russia, a US/UK Goal Since 1990
The assimilation of Ukraine into the Western world presents opportunities for the US/UK/EU to have regime change and breakup of Russia, similar to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1990
The US regrets not implementing its goal in the 1990s, when post-Soviet Russia lay in ruins.
Such an outcome would be more likely, if Russia’s 2022-invasion would fail, due to NATO sending weapons to Ukraine “for as long as it takes”
Sanctions Back-Firing on Vulnerable EU
The pre-meditated sanctions to economically weaken Russia largely failed.
Russia sold almost as much oil, gas and coal, etc., as before the sanctions, and at higher prices, which, in 2022, led to a very large balance of payments surplus, and a very strong ruble, and a much stronger economy than hoped for by the US/UK/EU
The sanctions backfired on Europe, which had to find new sources for oil, gas and coal, at much higher prices than it had been paying to Russia.
The sanctions benefitted US LNG producers/exporters and LNG carrier owners.
An Enlarged BRISC
Russia/China/India, etc., about 40% of the world’s population, with a GDP growing at 5 to 6 percent per year, aim to position a greatly enlarged BRICS as a viable, resource-rich, alternative to the Western World. That alternative would have:
- Its own currency, instead of dollars and euros
- Its own SWIFT-like system, instead of the western-dominated, weaponized SWIFT system
- Its own ports, its own freight insurance, and its own LNG and other ships; currently most that is dominated by the UK/EU
Ukraine Blowback onto the US
Biden's incompetent-Socialist posse, exporting our oil, gas and coal, is screwing the US people with higher oil, gas and coal prices.
The energy exports are contributing to 8+% inflation, which is impoverishing everyone.
Biden’s incompetent-Socialist posse want to send another $50 billion to Ukraine to cover 2023.
The US Congress has approved $65 billion in Ukraine aid, since Russia’s February 28, 2022, invasion of Ukraine; 2022 has not yet ended.
Biden’s incompetent-Socialist posse, and its foreign misadventures, such as the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, will cause Democrats to lose their ill-gotten control of the US Congress, after the November Election in 2022.
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine