Florida Major Hurricanes, 1900-2024: What Do the Statistics Show?


From Dr. Roy Spencer’s Global Warming Blog

by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.


.

Florida residents must feel like they have been taking a beating from major hurricanes in recent years, but what do the data show?

The problem with human perception of such things is, the time scale of hurricane activity fluctuations is often longer than human experience.

For example, a person born in the 1950s would have no memory of the beating Florida took in the 1940s from major hurricanes (a total of 5).

But they would have many memories of the hurricane lull period of the 1970s and 1980s, each decade having only one major hurricane strike in Florida.

Then, when an upswing in hurricane strikes occurs, it seems very unusual to them, and they assume that “hurricanes are getting worse”.

.

Another problem is, any statistics for an area as small as Florida, even over 100+ years, will be pretty noisy. Landfalling hurricanes for the eastern U.S. would be a better metric.

And statistics for the entire Atlantic basin would be even better, except that satellite coverage didn’t start until the 1979 and hurricane intensity in remote areas before then would be poorly measured (or not measured at all).

.

Finally, tropical cyclone statistics for the entire tropics would be the best (if one was trying to determine if climate change is impacting cyclone intensity or frequency).

But satellite data for the global tropics is, again, limited to the period since the 1979. Global tropical cyclone data before the 1979 is sketchy, at best.

.

So, keeping in mind, any trends we see for Florida are going to be strongly influenced by the “luck of the draw” and the quasi-random nature of hurricane tracks (hurricanes are steered by the large-scale flow of air in the mid-troposphere, say around 20,000 ft altitude or so), what are the statistics of Florida major hurricane intensity and frequency since 1900?

.

Florida Major Hurricane Intensity & Number

.

The following plot shows the intensity of major hurricanes (100 knots or greater maximum sustained wind speed) striking Florida since 1900, updated through recent (2024) Hurricane Helene:

.

.

As can be seen from the linear trend line, there has been no significant trend in the intensity of major hurricanes striking Florida since 1900.

.

But what about the number of hurricanes? The next plot shows there has been a weak upward trend in the decadal totals of major hurricanes striking Florida since 1900:

.

https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Florida-major-hurricanes-1900-2024-number-scaled-1.jpg?resize=300%2C225&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fl... 768w, https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fl... 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fl... 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fl... 136w, https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fl... 1320w, https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fl... 2220w" sizes="(max-width: 720px) 100vw, 720px" tabindex="0" />

.

Note the 2020s number might well increase, since the end of the current (2024) hurricane season will be only half-way through the 2020s.

While Hurricane Milton has just been classified as a major hurricane, in 2 days time it is expected to be under increasing wind shear, so it is not obvious it will strike Florida as a major hurricane, and so I did not include it in the above charts.

.

Another feature of the second chart above shows, a native Floridian born in the 1960s or 1970s would indeed have experienced an increase in major hurricanes striking Florida during their lifetime.

But their first couple of decades of personal experience would have occurred during a historic lull in hurricane activity.

.

Why Start In 1900?

.

There is reason to think, the number and/or intensity of major hurricanes striking Florida in the early 1900s has been underestimated, which would bias the trends in the above plots in the upward direction, spuriously suggesting a long-term increase in activity.

.

First of all, there were virtually no people living in Florida in 1900.

The population of Miami in 1896 was 444 persons. Most of Florida was forested

The intensity of a hurricane is based upon its maximum sustained 1- minute windspeed, which usually covers a very small area.

Even with millions of people now inhabiting much of the Florida coastline, it is rare for a coastal anemometer to measure the intensity that the National Hurricane Center gives to a hurricane, because those winds cover such a small area.

So, how could it ever be known how intense some hurricanes were in the early 1900s?

.

Evidence for Long-Term Hurricane Fluctuations Unrelated to Water Temperature

.

Modern concern centers on the possibility, warm sea surface temperatures from global warming is making hurricanes stronger or more frequent.

But studies of coastal lagoon sediments along the Gulf coast and Caribbean deposited by catastrophic hurricane landfalls show, large fluctuations in activity on centennial to millennial time scales, even in the absence of the unusually warm sea surface temperatures measured today. (Example here.)

.

It should also be remembered, not long ago the U.S. experienced an “unprecedented” 11-year drought in major hurricane strikes.

That significantly impacts our perception of what is “normal”.

When the lull had reached 9 years, a NASA study found such an event was a 1-in-177-years occurrence.

As I recall, that was increased to 1-in-250 years when the lull reached 11 years.

.

The point is that there is a huge amount of natural decadal-to centennial-time scale variability in hurricane activity in Florida (or any other hurricane-prone state).

But, with increasing numbers of people thinking,  the government is somehow influencing hurricane activity with cloud seeding (I’m seeing a lot of this on X), actual data will have much influence on those people.

As I approach 70 years on this Earth, I have noticed a long-term decline in critical thinking regarding weather, climate, and causation. I doubt that trend will change any time soon.

Views: 103

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2025   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service