Concerning Friends of Maines Mountains v AG of Maine, Wind hack, JaNET Mills
Mills is a highly biased democrat party AG appointee and strong pro-wind advocate.
This would appear to be biased political payback for the appointment of LePage's general council Carlie Mclean to the PUC who recently helped cause a new unbiased look at wind power contracts to occur in Maine.
Maine is a dirty little state politically. She forces a small organization she dislikes to be held to the highest ethical standards,at the same time she allows a company like First Wind to control the legislative process and gives passes to illegal process by the wind cartel in the state.She gives a free pass to clear conflicts of interest and potential graft of people like ex-PUC member Kurt Adams and his First Wind employment,which were concurrent,and then refuses to answer letters sent to her by anti-wind citizen groups requesting her to establish ethics standards for scoundrel companies like First Wind in Maine.
She is a unrepentant left wing pro wind hack and she is indeed the one deserving an investigation into her actions as AG .
LePage is right on wanting a new method of determining an AG in Maine. He has cut her budget before , and he should cut it more now.
Maine needs an AG that supports the public interest and the constitution, and not the wind lobby.
http://bangordailynews.com/2015/02/27/news/portland/ag-mills-orders...
Views: 499
Comment
-
Comment by Eric A. Tuttle on February 28, 2015 at 8:42am
-
An attorney general should be only concerned with current law, not play politics or interpret law to suit the needs of any individual or corporation. Similar to an appointment to the supreme court maybe a process of Nomination, Legislative confirmation for approval, and finally a public vote (to weed out any public concerns about past deeds, or conflicts) should be that process?
-
-
.... ex-PUC member Kurt Adams and his First Wind employment,which were concurrent, .... "Concurrent" Really? It looks to me that Kurt's position with First Wind was pre-negotiated pending his possible re-appointment to the PUC.
-
Comment by pat ledlie on February 28, 2015 at 8:13am
-
What is the evidence that this is about political payback? What things in her background show that she is biased? We need to be fair. Just because this is an organization whose goals we support that doesn't mean that they can "mismanage" the organization with impunity. Did they do the things that she is accusing them of or is she distorting the facts? They need to speak to their supporters.
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next ›
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2024 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine