Comment
There are a lot of devices that most all of us on the grid utilize each day that we give no thought to, as they serve only as a convenience item. These devices are often hidden from our thoughts but clearly in view. One example of the past was that electric kitchen clock, with 99% of its energy consumed was only dissipated in the form of heat. Though an addition slightly to winter needs and a burden equally in summer, the intent of use was a waste. The more modern clocks often use a single 1.5 volt battery and generally lasts upward of 2 years. Less than 1 watt of power vs several hundred for the same service. Remotes though battery operated, require that the receiver of the command I.E. TV requires that it be powered and ready to receive. Another hidden power usage, consuming power for that instant on convenience. One that I discovered recently, not so much that it did, but how much was a motion sensor activated light switch. Only having converted the light to a single LED bulb replacement from 2 40W to a single 11W LED with more lumen output was it apparent. (not apparent with 2 bulbs) When placing it in sensor mode, at night, the LED remained partially lit at about 1% brightness. 2.64 watts per day. Not seemingly much, but wasted energy use if left in that mode for 24 hours per day for a year 963.6 Watts, just under 1 kW per year. Now we have replaced a 5w nightlight which consumed 21.9 kw (12 hr avg use annually) with this hidden usage of power. Power that had been wasted invisibly through the circuit when standard or even dual LED bulbs were used. In one case, standby convenience usage is unneeded, in the second that standby usage became a more efficient usage. This is known as the power leakage principal, or Leaching of power.
Chargers that run beyond the required charging time to keep a battery at top performance when needed is a large consumer with the many devices that now require them. Unfortunately they do not all contain auto shutdown switches (though they could) and sometimes overcharging leads to premature battery failures, causing the need for a replacement which in turn demands more energy and toxin creation in their production, transportation, packaging and up the line. Yes the utilities will whine about rate increases for our conservation as they did in the early 80's but it is up to us to educate the PUC's and legislators and each other, that the true green, is to use only what is needed, not because it serves to anticipate our desires.
Pump all that Green Energy to the Cities, and they can still fail to become Green.
U.S. Sen Angus King
Maine as Third World Country:
CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power
Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.
Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT
******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********
(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/
Not yet a member?
Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?
We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
-- Mahatma Gandhi
"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi
Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!
Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future
"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."
https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/
© 2025 Created by Webmaster.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine