AOC an Actress? / The Green New Deal’s weak chain of logic

The Green New Deal's champion, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez "is not really the congresswoman of New York's 14th congressional district - she is essentially an actress, merely playing the part of a New York congresswoman", according to a new and very disturbing video. "If you find somebody with star power, you go with it and obviously Alexandria Ocasio Cortez has star power". "Their casting was perfect". "They freely admit it".

In the words of Alexandra Rojas, the executive director of the organization who found Ms. Ocasio Cortez, "Back in 2016 we put out a call for nominations and got 10,000 nominations. Out of those 10,000 nominations, we found Alexandria".

Could this and its implications be true?

Watch the video at the following weblink and decide for yourself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1h5iv6sECGU&feature=share

The Green New Deal’s weak chain of logic

By Daniel G. Jones 

Reagan observed: “It isn’t so much that liberals are ignorant. It’s just that they know so many things that aren’t so.”

So it is with the Green New Deal. Most liberals regard it as a simple proposition: Global warming is a really big problem, and it’s our fault, so let’s fix it.

But closer analysis reveals that the argument for the Green New Deal rests upon a long chain of interdependent assertions, every one of which must be believed for the problem to be of sufficient peril to warrant their drastic solution.

Here are links in their chain of logic. If you doubt the truth of any single step, you must discard the entire argument.

  • The global climate is warming.
  • Human activity is a major cause.
  • At the current rate of warming, our environment will suffer terrible degradation -- unprecedented droughts, more frequent and severe hurricanes, flooding of the coastlines. The planet will become inhabitable by 2100.
  • We can avert catastrophe only by implementing the Green New Deal, now. Otherwise, within 12 years we will reach a “tipping point” from which we can never recover. Earlier tipping points, having already expired without notice, are now irrelevant.
  • We must quickly and drastically reduce or eliminate carbon emissions from burning plant products, coal, petroleum, and natural gas. We must also reduce or eliminate bovine gas.
  • We must confine ourselves to using only renewable energy. This demands that we retrofit all buildings and redesign all machinery to operate with sunlight and wind power.
  • While the costs of converting our infrastructure to accommodate renewable energy are currently prohibitive (greater than our annual GNP), they will drop significantly with the advent of unknown future technology. When we take into account the vast numbers of new green jobs required for conversion, the Green New Deal will make us richer than ever.
  • Similarly, the problem of storing (intermittent) sun and wind power will be solved by currently-unknown future technology. This is the same technology that will solve the problem of carbon-free trans-oceanic transportation.
  • Technology will not enable us, however, to adapt to rising temperatures. Nor will we be able to adapt to gradually-rising seas by moving away from low-lying areas.
  • We mustn’t supplement our energy supplies with increased use of an existing technology, atomic power plants. Atomic energy is carbon-free, but it is far too dangerous (Chernobyl and Fukushima together have caused nearly fifty deaths so far!), even for the goal of saving the planet.

Continue reading at the following weblink:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/03/the_green_new_deals_we...

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/19/whos-behind-the-green...

About the corruption of climate science

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/17/about-the-corruption-of-clim...

Rep who pushed Maine carbon tax seen shopping in tax-free New Hampshire

http://maineexaminer.com/rep-who-pushed-maine-carbon-tax-seen-shopp...

Views: 277

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on March 19, 2019 at 9:41am

Poll shows Trump now more popular than Ocasio-Cortez in New York

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/03/poll_shows_trump_now_m...

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service