A Try at Electric Vehicles: Samuel Insull a Century Ago

By Robert Bradley Jr. -- May 3, 2023

Ed. Note: The current government-led drive for battery electric vehicles (EVs) can be informed by history. In the 1890s through about 1920, electric vehicles went from market dominance to market rejection, outcompeted by the gasoline-powered internal combustion engine. This post, and others at MasterResource (here and here), revisit the early history of the electric vehicle.

Electricity was the early front runner for horseless carriages, and the great man of electric utilities, Samuel Insull, got out in front. In 1898, Chicago Edison opened battery-charging stations and offered promotional rates to jumpstart this market. “Load-leveling” rates meant cheap off-peak charging at wholesale to serve this embryonic market.

In 1899, Insull became president of the $25 million Illinois Electrical Vehicle Transportation Company, the western branch of the Columbia Automobile Company of New York, to market electric cabs and carriages in Chicago. The plan was to have 1,000 taxis and rental vehicles profitably operating in the city, which as a byproduct would create a steady, off-peak “typical long-hour load” for Commonwealth Edison—far better than business that might add to the peak. As compared to storing power itself, Commonwealth Edison could “shift the charge and discharge losses of about 20 to 30 percent to the customer, but also battery maintenance” to customers.

But electric vehicles as a “complement” to public transportation—such as (electric) cab rides for $0.15 from the home to the streetcar stop—would prove too optimistic. Profits were scarce, and Insull used the occasion of a March 1901 drivers’ strike to liquidate Illinois Electrical.

Other cities held on a little longer, but competition from horse-drawn vehicles and the emerging gasoline-powered car proved too much in view of the stubborn limits to battery technology. Indeed, the lead acid battery, which an 1898 issue of Electrical World complained “will sputter, fume, give out on the road, leak, buckle, disintegrate, corrode, short-circuit and do many other undesirable things under the severe pressure of automobile work,” would never achieve the needed breakthroughs.

In 1900, Insull cofounded the Automobile Club of Chicago to sell the public on the new mode of transportation—and deal with the politics of a new entrant. The year before, for example, the city’s South Park Board prohibited motor vehicles from using the boulevards and parks, leaving bicycles and horse carriages. This “unprogressive” ban would be overturned by Chicago’s mayor.

Insull, “propelled by the vision of unified electric light, traction, and power distribution,” was not done yet with electric vehicles. In 1903, Insull got involved with an electric-car maker, Walker Vehicle Company, a relationship that would continue into the 1920s despite limited success.

Outside of short-haul delivery trucks, this market for electricity would not take hold despite ongoing efforts by Insull and Chicago Edison. The reason was Henry Ford’s gasoline-powered internal-combustion engine. Thomas Edison predicted as much in a conversation with Ford at the AEIC annual meeting in 1896, preserved for history by Samuel Insull himself. Edison labored to make batteries more economical for the transportation market, but the problem of weight/energy-density prevented both a Ford Electric market and a way to help meet peak load.

Views: 54

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Thinklike A. Mountain on May 6, 2023 at 12:12pm

The hidden costs of EVs: Ohio man gets $42,000 repair bill after fender bender in electric truck
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/ent-evs-hidden-costs...

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service