This is an email I received from a gentleman who was kind enough to break down the "TIF" process to me so I could understand how it DOES NOT benefit the tax paying citizens of Dixfield, ME.

 

Mr. Daley

 

Thank you for asking for clarity on a few of my recent statements in the RFT newspaper .

               

·          I was not able to attend the recent meeting when Mike Rogers presented his spreadsheet. However, I am familiar with his spreadsheet information. One of the critical decisions for any town to consider is whether they will accept a TIF agreement with the wind developer. As you may know, a TIF agreement identifies several Economic Development projects then agrees to use a portion of the calculated Tax Revenues for Economic Development. The remainder of the tax revenue would be retained by the wind developer to pay down his debt. In most TIF agreements, the developer expects to retain 60% of the tax revenue.

o         I’m sure Mr. Rogers defined “Certified Valuation” as approximately 72% of the Toatl value of the project. In Rumford, a proposed 12 turbine WEF would represent a $60M total value, but only $43M certified valuation.

o         When a developer negotiates with a small town they suggest a 40% to Town and 60% to Developer. In the case of a TIF, the portion of the Certified Valuation would be a mere $17.3M.  Typically, that amount would be available for Econ Dev NOT tax reduction.

o         If a town opts for NO TIF agreement, they would have full discretion of how to spend the entire amount of Tax Revenue. For a 12 turbine WEF, the tax revenue to the town would be $43M. If you multiply the MIL RATE times the tax Revenue, that would be a good estimate of the Revenue that could be applied to LOWER the Mil Rate.

·          Another tactic deployed by wind developers is that of proposing wind projects in smaller towns. The reason for this is twofold:

o         Most of the small towns and territories in Western Maine have ideal mountains without having numerous homes within one mile of the proposed turbine locations.

o         A small town, like Carthage, Woodstock or even Dixfield would realize a significantly larger portion of their respective Town Budget. Example: Comparing Rumford to Dixfield the ratio for added valuation from turbines might look great to Dixfield but poor for a large town like Rumford. My recent article focused on RUMFORD (a larger town). The benefits are puny when compared to losing our mountains to the developer.The other False Claims:

 

The other False Claims have been observed since 2009, when I attended a Wind Conference in Augusta sponsored by Governor Baldacci. During that conference the HIPE was very high. Selling Wind Energy to the attendees and to the State was a hot agenda item. Selected wind advocated went to the podium to praise the benefits of Wind Energy in Maine. They claimed it would lower our risks associated with National Security (Cars and trucks burn oil & gas. Wind will not help), CO2 Emissions Maine electric generators use very little coal or oil), lower cost of electricity and numerous permanent high paying jobs (part time jobs during construction and very few permanent jobs).

 

Also, during the day they had a person from U of California (Berkley) who spoke about his research study regarding Wind Turbine Impact on Scenic Views and property value for residents who live near turbines. His study was several years old and was based primarily on land formations UNLIKE our Maine, NH and Vermont landscapes. I asked the researcher if he could provide information that would reflect our terrain. He said he could not. However, The wind advocates (King, Baldacci, others) have continued to state that there is LITTLE or NO effect on homes near turbine locations. They lost their credibility!

 

It is common knowledge that electricity costs will go up. I think Maine should focus on Natural Gas for electric generation. A recent study by the u of Maine at Presque Isle showed that their installed wind turbine operated very inefficiently (approximately 11% of it’s stated capacity)

Views: 146

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by alice mckay barnett on July 9, 2011 at 5:55pm

what is going on Hart?        everyone who owns land in "impact zone" should stop and bitch at the town manager,,i mean selectmen...who will make a difference?

 

Comment by Dan McKay on June 2, 2011 at 5:14pm
Above and beyond property tax assessment, towns are now imposing fees per turbine to counter property devaluation.  The State currently imposes a fee of $ 4000 per turbine per year, but I hardly think this would cover the loss of property value.  A comprehensive review of property values within 2 miles of wind turbines and an assessed  total value loss of 40% needs to be determined.  We are considering 20 year projects, therefore, foreseeable improvements that might take place upon a property must be considered. Future building lots add taxable value to a town and in 20 years could exceed the value of wind facilities. Allowing evaluation of property as it currently exists is unreasonable to the landowner.  Your right to expectations is being trampled on for a fast buck by the Selectboard.  All landowners need to apply pressure to their Municipal Planning Boards, especially in Dixfield, where Colonel Holman Mountain has been determined to be a physical asset to bringing growth to town and is stated as such in the citizen adopted Comprehensive Plan of 2007.

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service