COMPARISON OF RECENT BATTERY SYSTEM TURNKEY CAPITAL COSTS

The turnkey capital cost of battery systems has been decreasing the past few years. The below table has turnkey capital costs/kWh of some 2016 and 2017 projects. Subsidies, such as cash grants, discounts, investment tax credit, ITC, and 5-year accelerated depreciation, which serve to reduce the cost/kWh, were ignored.

 

Entity

Type

 Location

Turnkey cost, $/kWh

GMP

PV solar/battery combo

 Stafford Hill, VT

 1572

Sterling utility

PV solar/battery combo

 Sterling, MA

692

GMP

Powerwall 2.0

 Distributed, VT

586

Australia utility

Wind/battery combo

 Southeast Australia

512

The cost/kWh would increase due to the cost of financing and amortizing; return on investment; O&M and disposal, and because the:

 

- Solar panels degrade over time, i.e., less kWh production/y

- Inverters often operate at part load, which is less efficient, i.e., increased losses

- Batteries degrade over time due to cycling, i.e., increased losses.

1) Green Mountain Power, a utility in Vermont with 77% of the electricity market, owns the Stafford Hill, 2.5 MW solar plant, 7722 panels, on about 20 acres. 

 

GMP added 2 MW (storage 2.4 MWh) of advanced lead acid batteries, 2 MW (storage 1 MWh), of lithium-ion batteries, total storage of 3.4 MWh, and (4) 500-kW inverters. This means 2 MW can be delivered for 1.7 hours, or 1 MW for 3.4 hours. 

 

The expected life of the batteries is about 10 - 15 years. The turnkey cost was about 7.155, solar system + 5.345, battery system = $12.5 million. 

 

Battery system turnkey capital cost = $5,345,000/3400 kWh = $1,572/kWh (2.27 times the $692/kWh cost of the Sterling, MA, battery system which performs similar functions as the GMP system). See below.

 

2) In Sterling, Massachusetts, NEC ES is providing a turnkey GSS® energy storage system which includes a single 53' container housing 3.9 MWh of lithium ion batteries, a 2 MW power conversion system, and proprietary NEC ES AEROS® controls software suite. NEC ES will provide service and maintenance. 

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/solar-energy-does-not-r...

 

Battery system turnkey capital cost = $2.7 million, or $692/kWh.

3) Tesla markets a wall-hung, nominal 14 kWh, available 13.5 kWh, Powerwall 2.0 battery unit, with lithium-ion cells made by Panasonic, either in Japan or Nevada. The unit is designed for daily charging and discharging.

 

Battery system turnkey capital cost = $6,200, factory FOB + S & H + Contractor markup of about 10 percent + Misc. hardware + Installation by 2 electricians, say 16 hours @ $60/h = $8,200, or $586/kWh. 

 

This is a Tesla estimate, which likely would be higher, depending on customer site conditions. The Tesla estimate does not include electrical system upgrades (if necessary), taxes, fees, and grid interface. Here is a schematic drawing of the miscellaneous equipment required for a turnkey system.

http://cdnassets.hw.net/d5/fc/a3926e9a4ec8a8026e9dd8bb3485/0616-jlc...

 

Tesla offers a 10-y warrantee for manufacturing defects, but does NOT cover performance. Tesla estimates a10% degradation in performance by year 10.

 

The unit likely contains enough batteries to store about 20 kWh, so by marketing a unit with an available 13.5 kWh, it likely never gets charged above 95% (charging to 100% is harmful) or discharged below 25% (discharging below 25% is harmful), thereby achieving the warranty 10-year life, 3600 cycles, likely with less than 10% degradation.

http://www.batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_prolong_lithi...

4) A Very Large Battery System in Australia: The Tesla Powerpack system in Australia, the largest in the world, has a rated capacity of 100 MW/129 MWh delivered as AC. The system:

 

1) Smoothens the variable output of a nearby 315 MW French-owned wind turbine system,

2) Prevents load-shedding blackouts and

3) Provides stability to the grid, during times other generators are started in the event of sudden drops in wind or other network issues.

 

Here is an aerial photo of the system on a 10-acre site. The installed cost of the Australian Powerpack system was about $66 million, or 66 million/129,000 = $512/kWh; this is a low price, because Tesla was eager to obtain the contract.

 

NOTE: The battery does not serve to store electricity for delivery at a later hour on the same day, or a week later, or several months later. For those purposes, much larger batteries would be required. 

 

Views: 359

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service