Maine must counter ‘regulatory malpractice’ on Aroostook Wind | Douglas Rooks

Another incorrigible greenie.

Maine must counter ‘regulatory malpractice’ on Aroostook Wind | Douglas Rooks

The state should take full control of this and future wind energy projects so it can meet its own needs first.

Posted 4:47 AM
Douglas Rooks

When he took office in 2011, Gov. Paul LePage seemed ambivalent about the wind energy projects being constructed around the state, chiefly in Washington County and western Maine. They were set in motion by legislation signed in 2003 by his predecessor, John Baldacci.

LePage soon turned against them, however, and no more turbines were approved.

Maine didn’t achieve the 3,000-megawatt goal Baldacci had set, and the state now has 923 megawatts in place. Turbine developers instead shifted their resources to the Great Plains, with major installations from the Dakotas south to Texas. Nonetheless, wind accounts for about a quarter of the electricity produced in Maine.

Now, Maine has the opportunity for a giant leap forward in windpower, more than doubling its capacity. It’s called Aroostook Wind, which at an initial size of 1,200 megawatts equals Hydro Quebec’s contribution to the Massachusetts grid that has flowed through Maine since January. Turbine technology has greatly improved since the earlier models installed here, with enormous towers expected that are far more efficient and can operate in lighter winds.

Aroostook is especially well adapted to these advances, since windspeeds are particularly strong at night — when solar arrays, which have seen substantial expansion in Maine over the past decade, are not producing.

All the New England states except New Hampshire have renewable energy mandates, and Maine’s is the most ambitious — 100% carbon-neutral electricity by 2040. Aroostook Wind and other potential projects are by far the cheapest and fastest way of meeting those requirements, coming in at about one-third the price of recent projections for offshore wind.

Yet only a small fraction of these enormous public benefits will be realized under the current RFP (request for proposal) put out to bid by the Maine Public Utilities Commission. Following an earlier RFP where the bidder withdrew because of escalating costs, the PUC has decided the project won’t be owned by Maine, but will effectively be shared throughout New England.

The specific provision requires that Aroostook power be offered to all participating states under exactly the same terms and pricing as Maine. It doesn’t take a genius to realize that most of the electricity will flow to Massachusetts and Connecticut, which together have nearly 10 times the population of Maine. Former State Planning Director Richard Silkman has accurately described this PUC decision as “regulatory malpractice.”

Control of our own energy infrastructure was exactly the issue that led .................................

Continue reading at https://www.pressherald.com/2026/02/26/maine-must-counter-regulatory-malpractice-on-aroostook-wind-douglas-rooks/

 

************************************* 


Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

  • Dan McKay

    You want to talk MALPRACTICE, Well consider the costs of RECs

      The total cost of compliance with the RPS for 2023 was about $83.2 million or 0.696 cents per kilowatt-hour. 
    Of the total cost, the approximate cost of RECs in each category was: 
     Class I: $38.8 million,  Includes wind and solar
      Class IA: $20.4 million, Includes wind and solar
     Class II: $21.1 million,  includes wind and solar
     TRECs: $2.9 million. A dumb catergory. Of the total 2023 Thermal REC obligation, only about 26% was fulfilled using RECs and the remaining 74% was fulfilled by an ACP. 
    The average price per REC in each category was: 
     Class I: $33.96,      ACP = $50.00   
     Class IA: $21.15,    ACP = $50.00 
     Class II: $5.93,       ACP = $5.00
     TRECs: $24.14      ACP = $25.00
    The Alternate Compliance Payments (ACP) are meant to be caps on prices for RECs, but when demand exceeds supply, the RECs will be purchased above the ACP as the Class II price above reveals
    RPS requirement for 2023 = 52% of Maine's total consumption for 2023 will mean purchasing RECs above and beyond the purchase of 100% physical energy ( REAL ENERGY) from the wholesale market.
    RPS requirement for 2026 = 65%
     
    How much wind and solar revenue comes from RECs?    This chart from ISO-NE indicates that wind doubles their revenues with the sale of RECs and solar receives 75% to 90% of their revenues from RECs

    There is no doubt that 2025 and going forward REC payments will equal or exceed the ACP as 5 of the 6 New England States expand their Renewable Portfolio Requirements causing a fury of competition to meet compliance. The Trump administration has pulled federal renewable subsidies and stopped offshore wind, which will drastically reduce REC supplies. Even New Hampshire which has tried to avoid renewable costs and refuses to participate in the Aroostook Wind Scam will be paying higher costs for RECs. 
    Maine people do not need more price hikes in electricity, especially from paying for inflating RECs. 
  • Thinklike A. Mountain

    No Wonder U.S. Rep.Chellie Pingree, D-Secret-InsideTrader, Skipped The State Of The Union
    https://www.themainewire.com/2026/02/no-wonder-u-s-rep-chellie-ping...

  • Dan McKay

    I will help you out, Mr. Rooks.

    Maine ratepayers want a half of billion dollars for payments made to the Renewable Portfolio Progam

    Maine ratepayers want 300 million for payments made to RGGI

    Maine ratepayers want 3/4 of a billion dollars for payments made to Net Energy Billing

    Maine ratepayers want all the money paid to Efficiency Maine Trust

    Please remit this bill porportionally to each state in New England