So natural gas prices are the problem NRCM? Any comment on the fact that the so called environmental groups have succeeded at blocking badly needed new pipelines into Maine.* Taking a big step back, Maine sits next to the largest natural gas produciing area in the nation and it is a crying shame that liberal run states and their enviroshills have choked off the much needed supply, sending Maine energy costs through the roof.
But wait.....the people who caused the high prices in the first place now say they have the solution.
Meanwhile, when the dunderheads brand natural gas as a dirty fuel, they ignore the fact that increased use of natural gas in Maine is actually the single largest reason their dreaded CO2 emissions have dropped, last I looked.
Is natural gas dirty? NO.
Is the money moving around in the "green" movement dirty? You tell me.
December 5, 2025
Anya Fetcher is the federal policy advocate at the Natural Resources Council of Maine.
EXCERPTS
Energy affordability is a major issue for families and small businesses in Maine, and it’s not getting better. Starting Jan. 1, most Mainers will see their electricity bills jump by $11 to $16 per month. Why? Because New England’s power prices are still yoked to natural gas prices.
The single largest contributor to high energy costs in Maine is our state’s dependence on fossil fuels we have to buy from far away. To break this cycle, we need to build more clean energy in Maine. Homegrown clean energy is the best opportunity we have to bring more affordable, reliable energy to Maine people quickly........
......Electricity supply costs in Maine are driven by the cost of natural gas power generation on the New England grid, and we will continue to be exposed to these fossil fuel price risks for as long as we are dependent on these sources of energy.
* The Appalachian region is the largest natural gas production area in the United States, and the Marcellus Shale basin is the largest source of that regional production. The Northeast, long accustomed to being "at the end of the pipeline," now finds itself located next to - and indeed on top of - one of the largest natural gas basins in the U.S.
https://northeastgas.org/marcellus-shale
************************************
Fair Use Notice: This website may reproduce or have links to copyrighted material the use of which has not been expressly authorized by the copyright owner. We make such material available, without profit, as part of our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, economic, scientific, and related issues. It is our understanding that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided by law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes that go beyond "fair use," you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Dan McKay
The hard truths about New York's energy policies:
Note the similarity with Maine policies:
"Reducing Firm Capacity + Mandating Load Growth + Massive Spending on Climate Policies = Low Supply and High Costs."
"At the same time New York has constrained the supply of nuclear and natural gas plants in the state, the state has simultaneously mandated a massive increase in demand by requiring the electrification of home heating and transportation. "
5 hours ago
Dan McKay
Massachusetts
Electricity Costs:
The Real Source
of the Problem
A Data-Driven Explanation for
Ratepayers and Legislators by Lisa Linowes
"Massachusetts residents served by
Eversource (NSTAR) and National Grid have
watched their electric bills rise sharply over
the past decade. Understandably, many blame
the utilities whose names appear on the bills. Yet
the real drivers of higher costs lie elsewhere. The
increases stem primarily from state-mandated
climate and energy programs that have become
embedded in electric rates—programs enacted by
law and implemented through regulation, not by
utility choice."
"If these policies were intended to lower carbon
emissions, they have proved to be an extremely
expensive way to do it. From 2014 to 2024,
the carbon intensity of electricity generation
across New England fell about 18 percent. The
decline was driven primarily by the retirement
of coal plants, the shift to more efficient naturalgas generation, and the adoption of federal
environmental standards, developments that
occurred with little additional cost to ratepayers.
Massachusetts now collects more than $4 billion
per year through climate-policy surcharges, yet
there is no clear relationship between those retail
charges and regional emission trends."
2. Policy Charges Driving Costs
"These policy-driven costs include energyefficiency programs, net-metering credits, and the
SMART solar incentive, all of which guarantee
above-market compensation or rebates to solar
producers and fund efficiency projects through
rate surcharges. They also include the Renewable
Portfolio Standard (RPS) and the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which require
utilities to purchase renewable-energy credits and
carbon allowances."
https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fiscalalliancefoundation/pages/234...
3 hours ago