Trust the science? Why would anyone ever want to do that in this era?
Intellectual sellouts have been hiding information like this for decades. This was written when most turbine blades were 20-30 feet long and had tip speeds of about 125 mph. Just think of the suction pulling on birds and bats that's created by an 80 meter turbine blade traveling with tip speeds of 300 mph. If the first pass of a blade doesn't get them, the next one will.
I have been saving this bit of hidden science and much more for a Fountain wind lawsuit. 

Very much looking forward to exposing Green research and its shill experts. 

Just applying some deductive reasoning based upon the laws of Physics, examining absurd research methodologies in an atmosphere of no regulations,  an absence of scientific method, infrequent searches in tiny areas, disclosing as little as possible from the field, and agency collusion, it’s easy to conclude that wind energy research going back decades is primarily contrived garbage.    

Some of this garbage is even given a stamp of approval by an elitist group of idiots known as the  “peer reviewed club.”

Views: 200

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Frank Haggerty on July 30, 2021 at 7:50am

Massachusetts Politicians Were Aware of Two Types Of Wind Turbine Noise in 2005

One measured in decibels and the second was called nuisance noise. 

Federal researchers discovered wind turbine infra sound in 1987 at Boone North Carolina at a 2 Megawatt wind turbine. ( This is when low frequency or infrasound cover-up began). After 1987 they called it a human annoyance.

Here is the Mattapoisett Massachusetts 2005 reference material :

The material clearly describes two distinct types of noise.

Regulatory & Human Annoyance

On page 14 of the Marion, Mattapoisett, and Rochester wind test study-

Noise

Noise considerations generally take two forms, state regulatory compliance and nuisance levels at nearby residences:

A. ”Regulatory compliance”: Massachusetts state regulations do not allow a rise of 10 dB or greater above background levels at a property boundary (Massachusetts Air Pollution Control Regulations, Regulation 310 CMR 7.10). This sound level is very unlikely to be reached in case at the sites we examined.

B.” Human annoyance”: Aside from Massachusetts regulations, residences must also be taken into consideration. Any eventual turbine would be sited such that it would be inaudible or minimally audible at the nearest residences

http://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/15538111/tri-town-orr-prelimi...

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service