Gov Mills sets renewable energy goals in climate change speech

In a speech to the Environmental and Energy Technology Council of Maine, Mills said she will introduce legislation to create a Maine Climate Council that will develop an action plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help communities adapt to a changing climate. Mills has set an interim goal of 80 percent electricity generation from renewable sources by 2030 and a longer-term goal of 100 percent by 2050.

She also reiterated her pledges to promote development of solar energy, to expand utilization of heat pumps and to “vigorously support the University of Maine to lead the country in offshore floating platform wind technology development.”.............................This story will be updated.

https://www.pressherald.com/2019/02/28/mills-sets-renewable-energy-...

BDN

However, a Mills spokeswoman gave no details about who would be on the council, and it’s unclear what standards Mills is using for renewables. The federal government says Maine already gets about three-quarters of its electricity from renewable sources, though the state abides by a renewable standard that doesn’t include large hydroelectric installations.

This story will be updated.

https://bangordailynews.com/2019/02/28/politics/mills-adds-maine-to...

Providence Journal editorial on hydro from Canada

The project would not, unfortunately, negate the pressing need to improve the region’s natural gas pipeline infrastructure and to build new and efficient plants, such as the one proposed in Burrillville, to replace those going offline. New England will require natural gas for decades to come, experts say.

https://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/20190227/editorial-hopes-...

Views: 124

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Willem Post on March 1, 2019 at 11:00am

The governors of Maine and of Massachusetts are cleverly colluding, in secret, behind closed doors, to fulfill their overly expensive RE agendas

Their climate change speeches and pro-RE government "hearings with pre-selected witnesses" about carbon taxes are diversionary tactics, red herrings, that aim to sway/befuddle/screw the gullible, lay public.

It would be much better for Maine and the rest of NE to have much more STEADY, LOW-COST, NEAR CO2-FREE electricity from H-Q in Canada. See below

That approach would cost far less than burdening hard-pressed Maine households with more REGRESSIVE, UNILATERAL carbon taxes that would gratify ego-centric folks with RE agendas and campaign promises, who are claiming they are entitled, because they are saving the world.

BULL MANURE. DO NOT RE-ELECT THEM. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH 

Increased Canadian Low-Cost Hydro Electricity Much Less Costly Than Expensive Batteries

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/ne-wind-and-solar-elect...

 

In 2050, additional tie line capacity to nearby grids, plus modifications to the NE grid could be in place for total capital cost of about 10 - 15 billion dollars, which would be amortized over40 years, i.e., much better than amortizing very expensive batteries over 15 years

 

- The annual electricity would be increased from 21.4 TWh in 2018 to 34.75 TWh in 2050. See table 2

- The daily electricity would be 0.059 TWh/d in 2018 and 0.095 TWh/d in 2050

- The tielines would be designed for temporary supply rates of 2 TWh/d

- The 7-day W&S lull shortfall of electricity would be eliminated.

- Grid-scale batteries would not be required, because the hydro plants of H-Q would efficiently perform most of the peaking, filling-in and balancing of the NE grid at very low cost. See table 2.

 

See spectrum Vaclav Smil URL

 

https://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/environment/a-critical-look-at-cla...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/economics-of-tesla-powe...

http://www.windtaskforce.org/profiles/blogs/partial-capital-cost-of...

 

Table 2/Year 2050

Batteries

Increased H-Q Hydro

Increased H-Q Hydro

Plus Batteries

No Batteries

Normal wind plus ATM solar, TWh/d

0.298

0.298

0.298

Wind plus ATM solar during lull, TWh/d

0.060

0.060

0.060

Daily shortfall, TWh/d

0.238

0.238

0.238

Lull period, days

7

7

7

Lull shortfall, TWh

1.669

1.669

1.669

Increased H-Q hydro, TWh

1.070

1.669

Remaining lull shortfall, TWh

0.599

0.000

Charged into batteries, TWh as AC

1.669

0.599

In batteries, TWh as DC

1.517

0.544

Discharged from batteries, TWh as AC

1.379

0.495

Loss, AC to AC basis, TWh

0.290

0.104

Loss, AC to AC basis, %

17.36

17.36

Battery not full

1.5

1.5

Battery capacity, TWh as AC

2.069

0.742

Increased tie lines

Capital cost @ $100/kWh, $billion

207

74

10 - 15

Useful service life, year

15

15

Amortize @ 9%/y for 15 y, $billion/y

25.2

9.0

Comment by Whetstone_Willy on February 28, 2019 at 12:44pm

Comment by Art Brigades on February 28, 2019 at 12:39pm

February 28, 2019

Mills announces proposal to create Maine Climate Council

Governor Mills’ full remarks at E2TECH are included below:

Thank you. I have to say, I am proud to see so many entrepreneurs, innovators, educators, nonprofit and business leaders and fellow policy makers gathered together to discuss our state’s energy future.

It will take all of us working together to chart a new, better path forward for our state, but first we must address the challenges we face today -the chief among them being climate change.

A friend recently called my attention to a scientific paper entitled “The Artificial Production of Carbon Dioxide and Its Influence on Temperature.”

Not exactly light reading.

The British engineer who wrote the paper concluded that human activities were changing the earth’s weather and that, in fact, fossil fuels were to blame- a novel concept!

I bring it to your attention because that paper was published in 1938. No kidding!

G.S. Callender wrote back then – more than 80 years ago- that the impact of carbon dioxide on weather “is not only possible, but is actually occuring at the present time.”

The threat Callender warned us of is the same threat we face today- the threat to the very survival of the human species caused by climate change.

The threat of climate change, obviously, is not only local and not only national; it is global.

Nevertheless, we must ask ourselves what can we do to make a real difference right here in Maine.

What clean energy investments will we insist on?

What infrastructure will be required to electrify our transportation sector?

What are the resources and the unique advantages Maine may have that will yield environmental benefits in excess of the negative impacts of our own activities?

Clearly, the thinking and research and discussions held here today are critical for informing policy.

Some of you may have seen a report in the Washington Post late last year titled simply “We are in trouble.” In the report, scientists predict that global emissions of carbon dioxide have reached their highest levels on record.

This followed the report by the United Nations laying out a grim prognosis for the future of our planet, as well as the report from the Trump Administration (which they attempted to discredit) that forecasts serious trouble for New England.

We do not need another report to tell us what we already know: that our climate is changing; that it is changing rapidly; that it will have profound implications for us and for future generations; and that there is limited time to address it.

We know this because, here in Maine, we are witnessing these changes firsthand:

-The Gulf of Maine is warming at a rate faster than 99 percent of the world’s oceans, driving our lobster populations further up the coast.

-Our coastal waters are growing more acidic, weakening the shells of lobsters, clams, scallops and oysters.

-Temperatures, along with our climate, are fluctuating more wildly, leading to natural disasters, increased tick populations and rising seas.

In the not too distant future, my grandchildren could reach my age and live in a Maine I would not recognize.

Will they know the singsong call of a black-capped chickadee or the smell of asters and lilies?

Will they know what the bark of a fir tree looks like or the grit of sand between their toes as they walk along the shores of Perkins Cove?

With butter on their lips and sun on their faces will they taste Maine in lobsters caught off Casco Bay?

If we do not address climate change, they may not remember any of those things. They may no longer know the state we all call home.

Black-capped chickadees are fleeing north. Five times more lobsters with diseased shells have been caught between 2010 and 2012. Ninety-two species of wildflowers - including asters and lilies - and 16 percent of our native trees - including fir - were already disappearing as of 2014.

Tick borne diseases are up nearly 700 percent from a decade ago and our beaches and seaside streets are already at risk of irreversible flooding.

You know, there are people who would still have us take no steps forward while climate change knocks louder, every day, on our front door.

Despite the banging which is impossible to ignore, they stick their fingers in their ears and plead for more time. “Climate change is not real, it is not happening here, it is not happening now” they chant while day by day, our environment slips away.

We do not have more time. The time for action is now. Wise, prudent, informed action...but action nonetheless.

In the past two months - with open doors and open minds- my Administration has welcomed innovative approaches and serious climate change prevention and mitigation efforts.

We are setting a renewable energy model for our state by preparing to install solar panels on the Blaine House grounds.

We have taken a strong stance against offshore drilling and the pillaging of our coasts and by lifting the moratorium on wind power, we are sending a clear signal to renewable energy investors nationwide- our state welcomes you once again.

Earlier this week I was proud to attend the National Governors Association Annual Winter meeting in Washington D.C. and honored to be named Chair of the NGA’s Natural Resources Committee.

No longer will Maine isolate ourselves from the rest of the country. I look forward to working with our neighbors in New England and states nationwide to develop solutions to the shared challenges we face.

As today’s theme suggests, - ‘a change is gonna come.’

I would argue change is already here - in more ways than one.

Today, I am excited to announce that Maine is now the 22nd member-state of the United States Climate Alliance.

While the federal government ignores its responsibility to combat climate change, Maine will work with states across the country to meet the goals outlined in the Paris Climate Accord.

We will reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent by the year 2025 and by 80 percent by 2050.

That may seem ambitious.

After all, Maine is the most heating oil dependent state in the country, with nearly 70% of homeowners relying on oil for their heating needs.

We send five billion dollars out of state every year to pay for our use of nonrenewable fossil fuels.

Our high costs of energy and electricity are a barrier to our health and a deterrent to our economy, while our cars and trucks account for more than half of our carbon dioxide emissions.

Still, as author John Maxwell once said, “Impossible is not a fact. It is an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It is a dare...”

Do we dare to achieve the impossible?

To move us in this direction, I will introduce legislation to create the Maine Climate Council.

The Maine Climate Council will be responsible for developing an action plan and a timetable to meet our emission reduction goals and to ensure that Maine’s communities and economy are resilient to the effects of climate change.

The Climate Council will be comprised of commissioners and key state leaders, science and technical experts, non-profit leaders, and representatives of climate- impacted industries.

The Council will be established in statute. It will solicit public input and report regularly to the public on progress toward the following goals:

The Council will lead our efforts to reduce Maine greenhouse gas emissions. And, with the Council’s leadership, our state will achieve 80 percent renewable energy in our electricity sector by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050.

I look forward to engaging with many of you as this legislation moves through the Legislature and the Council begins its critical work in the coming months.

My Administration will also soon make announcements for other initiatives to address climate change by improving Maine’s transportation sector and our energy and efficiency standards.

My administration will work with the legislature to promote solar and make this technology accessible for more Maine people. We will introduce legislation to implement our 100,000 heat pump challenge announced earlier this month. We will vigorously support the efforts of the University of Maine to lead the country in off-shore wind technology development. And we will mobilize state government to lead the way on energy conservation, weatherization and smart transportation measures.

While these are important changes, climate change is one of the greatest threats ever faced by humans in modern times. The threat will be met not by silver bullets of compulsion, but by actions taken promptly by all of humanity.

In that pursuit: let us dare to achieve the impossible, let us embrace and invest in our future, and let us do it in a thoughtful way that looks decades down the road - to the fir trees, asters, and chickadees that remain for our grandchildren, and their children.

That is how we truly lead.

I look forward to working with all of you in this room, including the many lawmakers, innovators, and advocates among you who have done this critical work for decades. In my Administration you will always find a committed partner who shares your passion for tackling climate change and building a brighter, greener future for our state.

Thank you.

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

© 2019   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service