Monhegan floating wind - the twenty year rationale

Listen as UMaine Anthony Viselli "explains"  for 45 seconds the need for the floating wind turbines to stay off Monhegan for twenty years. His claim:  by the time 20 years have blown past, the two floating turbines chugging away will have earned  hundreds of  million dollars or more selling electricity. This money will then be used to set up more of them further offshore. Yeah, right..

Views: 171

Comment

You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!

Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine

Comment by Penny Gray on May 6, 2017 at 9:21am

Sounds like he's explaining that the length of the "test period" must be twenty years because those two turbines have to operate for 20 years in order to make enough money to finance the project. That's so laughable it isn't funny.  Do these academics have a clue what they're doing? Twenty years????

Comment by Ron Huber on May 5, 2017 at 10:55am

Regarding the distance from Monhegan permissible for floating wind whackers, hearken back to  2010 when LD1810 when Maine's ocean wind laws were first passed

1.Audio from the final legislative hearing 3/24/10 on the offshore wind bill.  2.The Maine PUC'  RFP.  

1.  At the final work session on LD 1810 on March 24th, the Utilities and Energy Committee had the the competitive solicitation process for offshore wind in the bill summarized for them. As the committee analyst said: "It clarifies who's in and out". 
Transcribed below and also at  at 8 minutes 57 seconds into this recording from the hearing  is that description of eligible applications:
"Wind energy developments connecting to the transmission system within Maine using one or more floating turbines in the Gulf of Maine at 300 feet or greater in depth and no less than 10 nautical miles from any land area of the state other than the coastal wetlands or an uninhabited island. So that type of offshore project would be eligible."
I think this is a pretty unambiguous statement: "no less than ten nautical miles from any land area of the state other than the coastal wetlands or an uninhabited island".
 
2. This is  repeated in the PUC's official  competitive solicitation RFP noticeIn relevant part the notice says: 
"For purposes of the competitive solicitation, "deep-water offshore wind energy   
pilot project" means a wind energy development, as defined by Title 35-A, section 3451, 
subsection 11,1 that is connected to the electrical transmission system located in the 
State and employs one or more floating wind energy turbines in the Gulf of Maine at a 
location 300 feet or greater in depth no less than 10 nautical miles from any land area of  
the State other than coastal wetlands, as defined by Title 38, section 480B, subsection 2.2  
 or an uninhabited island. "
 I don't think that Monhegan can be considered an "uninhabited island", do you?
How is siting them within 3 miles OK?
Comment by arthur qwenk on May 4, 2017 at 5:38pm

Alert to Monhegan residents.

These test turbines are just the start of dozens more to come in the same area. This is how the wind scumbags work, their modus operandi.

Squeeze the door open, then build on it shortly thereafter in the same area.

They utilize that technique everywhere they go , whether land based or at sea.

Kick them out. Do not let them get a beachhead in your backyard!

 

Maine as Third World Country:

CMP Transmission Rate Skyrockets 19.6% Due to Wind Power

 

Click here to read how the Maine ratepayer has been sold down the river by the Angus King cabal.

Maine Center For Public Interest Reporting – Three Part Series: A CRITICAL LOOK AT MAINE’S WIND ACT

******** IF LINKS BELOW DON'T WORK, GOOGLE THEM*********

(excerpts) From Part 1 – On Maine’s Wind Law “Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine if the law’s goals were met." . – Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting, August 2010 https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/From Part 2 – On Wind and Oil Yet using wind energy doesn’t lower dependence on imported foreign oil. That’s because the majority of imported oil in Maine is used for heating and transportation. And switching our dependence from foreign oil to Maine-produced electricity isn’t likely to happen very soon, says Bartlett. “Right now, people can’t switch to electric cars and heating – if they did, we’d be in trouble.” So was one of the fundamental premises of the task force false, or at least misleading?" https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/wind-swept-task-force-set-the-rules/From Part 3 – On Wind-Required New Transmission Lines Finally, the building of enormous, high-voltage transmission lines that the regional electricity system operator says are required to move substantial amounts of wind power to markets south of Maine was never even discussed by the task force – an omission that Mills said will come to haunt the state.“If you try to put 2,500 or 3,000 megawatts in northern or eastern Maine – oh, my god, try to build the transmission!” said Mills. “It’s not just the towers, it’s the lines – that’s when I begin to think that the goal is a little farfetched.” https://www.pinetreewatchdog.org/flaws-in-bill-like-skating-with-dull-skates/

Not yet a member?

Sign up today and lend your voice and presence to the steadily rising tide that will soon sweep the scourge of useless and wretched turbines from our beloved Maine countryside. For many of us, our little pieces of paradise have been hard won. Did the carpetbaggers think they could simply steal them from us?

We have the facts on our side. We have the truth on our side. All we need now is YOU.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

 -- Mahatma Gandhi

"It's not whether you get knocked down: it's whether you get up."
Vince Lombardi 

Task Force membership is free. Please sign up today!

Hannah Pingree on the Maine expedited wind law

Hannah Pingree - Director of Maine's Office of Innovation and the Future

"Once the committee passed the wind energy bill on to the full House and Senate, lawmakers there didn’t even debate it. They passed it unanimously and with no discussion. House Majority Leader Hannah Pingree, a Democrat from North Haven, says legislators probably didn’t know how many turbines would be constructed in Maine."

https://pinetreewatch.org/wind-power-bandwagon-hits-bumps-in-the-road-3/

© 2024   Created by Webmaster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service