At the Sept 14th meeting, the state and local federal officials assembled were told to bring maps to the November meeting. Maps with locations that
could be leased to monopile windfarms - windmills blasted and pounded into the seafloor. These are the type that Angus King and his cronies would like to profit by building close to the coast.
However, Maine's government and state university have chosen not to pursue that type of ocean windfarming. Instead they have opted to develop floating deepwater windmills far offshore -out of sight of coastal residents and their scenic economic resources, and away from nearshore fishing grounds and sailing areas. The University of Maine and its Deepwind Consortium have received at least 40 millions in federal funding to (1) carry out their R&D, (2) produce a first prototype and (3) build and deploy a full sized deepwater floating windmill, connecting by cable with the mainland somewhere in New England.
So there are tensions going into the November 16th meeting. A great opportunity to widen the split between the speculators like King and the University-led local consortium. If pressured well, Maine's agency representatives may end up surprising officials of BOEMRE's offshore wind power division by declining to map out hundreds of square miles of seamounts and ledge-filled submerged wildlands. May decline to facilitate a windrush of speculators like Angus King.
Maine should follow the lead of its scientific community and focus on ocean energy solutions that do not harm the very economies they purport to be helping. that can easily be moved and disassembled if wrongly placed.There's a wedge. Let's widen it.
You need to be a member of Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine to add comments!
Join Citizens' Task Force on Wind Power - Maine